Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEbjYSCRLhp9OvNSvgNQa6V+DD5Vt0HsRkotCpUSv3UVCuVEHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAEbjYSDm4WYOL2s9bqnpCDWoda+cinVo9v3MkOV_G7vM_PRH_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOEq2C5OAn6GXUzsWLFz6WgOpB7sbC-PCmhLgSL2ncvvcr=TRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEbjYSCRLhp9OvNSvgNQa6V+DD5Vt0HsRkotCpUSv3UVCuVEHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:33:09 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62yQX0+qKS8fQzdrWe_z2zh5qyzKNSHvPuEV=DUKbtUo0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HBase Replication Questions
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c242e847cb7c04e9d4af8f

--001a11c242e847cb7c04e9d4af8f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Please see also 'Replication Metrics' at the bottom of
http://hbase.apache.org/replication.html


On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, hdev ml <hdevml@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Demai. Need to find out how to access HBase metrics.
>
> But thanks for your insights.
> Harshad
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Demai Ni <nidmgg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1)  you can use replication metrics info such as:ageOfLastShippedOp,
> > timeStampsOfLastShippedOp, sizeOfLogQueue ageOfLastAppliedOp, and
> > timeStampsOfLastAppliedOp to figure out the lag.
> > 2) with my best knowledge, the replication won't be together with
> snapshot.
> > That is the peers won't know there is a restore occurred on primary. So a
> > user must take care it manually.   the VerifyReplication tool may be
> > helpful to identify which data (boundary by timestamps) is mismatch, so
> the
> > copyTable doesn't have to copy the whole table
> >
> > Demai
> >
> > Demai
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:07 PM, hdev ml <hdevml@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have a couple of questions for HBase.
> > >
> > > 1. Is there any way to find out by how much time the replication is
> > lagging
> > > on the peer cluster or even primary cluster is ok.
> > > 2. Say replication is going on for some time for a table and then you
> > > restore a snapshot on the Primary. Would replication catch up with the
> > > restore snapshot? Or do I have to treat that as replicating from
> scratch,
> > > meaning
> > >
> > >    1. disable peer
> > >    2. restore snapshot on primary
> > >    3. copyTable upto disable timestamp
> > >    4. enable peer
> > >
> > >
> > > Any help is appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Harshad
> > >
> >
>

--001a11c242e847cb7c04e9d4af8f--