Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26583103E2 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 05:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1183 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 05:59:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 1131 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 05:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 1119 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2013 05:59:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 05:59:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.41] (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 05:59:19 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id g17so6288257vbg.28 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:58:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=K6safTD5tDUVy25e+Le0eKP5zqjw9gTJ0hePAW6Aq+0=; b=g7PgwpfFspReJxKCYTGXJH+YWjxoIrEFz42SC5/P837ThcJRwcV5RAd4CrRn7XgFqx 78Jd/ti3LarLNBXBtjFFKmupiJBYvocsr6IKCjf3HDpzlCsr4vlMHYoYMCrm9oFLm3xi 7YrkkOLFcK9oEUX5PYhqoGdXaxPYr/9Aj2RkrA2cfJdMj9Mc9ftVJd4mv30PLd5sAxY/ tS/XZy/cE9Qw4XWhkpnx8nBBYYFCVhKOTRTukMOdpBlMytgB2X+llQiNJHV5kVyveEJt N8dh4iipyw1ooyXnBZQ6sulRuf9W3WUHwG1qwvsxEYqle5Qg3mUSDsVQ6K0vxJ7iYG9D xexg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7HES/1+V2xbbzoMMcPTfhRBwgHeGtGTRJ9sOxnLh3YsXJ8lzPmI14zVuKDK3y5IVlgT07 X-Received: by 10.58.208.130 with SMTP id me2mr41551670vec.13.1379570318829; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:58:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.34.101 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:58:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:58:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Limit number of columns in column family To: user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc192ccbfaed04e6b63e6a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bdc192ccbfaed04e6b63e6a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi MBE, When you are saying "cells with least timestamp being removed" you mean versions of the same cell? Or any cell in the same row/cf? JM 2013/9/18 M. BagherEsmaeily > Hi, > I have a column family that I want the number of columns on it has a > specific limit, and when this number becomes greater than the limit, cells > with least timestamp being removed, like TTL on count not time. > Please guide me to find best optimized way. > > Thanks. > MBE > --047d7bdc192ccbfaed04e6b63e6a--