Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5526B10CAE for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3403 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2013 12:35:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 3238 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2013 12:35:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 2969 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2013 12:35:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:35:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vkjk89@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.42] (HELO mail-pb0-f42.google.com) (209.85.160.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:34:56 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id un15so374045pbc.29 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4sIxKXLvQKS+iEoEclB5+NUw8r4BfvdDmW62g+FbQKg=; b=f8aaa/CYv5OImfN6lQ1mlnPMh6txzTrMK+op26M5+t8JKmyJDHoEllzoKpXUP2KskK P5zl72CjNYjMyhU7zenVkccpuA50MKkkUACjYzlIBjitTtUY9EbU8ggcqLn7r8EYFEEG hFpXrIFOMIHI6itvD70o+BS0SlYlQb0PYmWyArpjYElTooRqtv4ITRePLGrv1cLdeVEO NthcuSsA7x41ieNAkFzhZYtwYIXnRytufevW5FUIcpRwcDy7Mz3L/ADsjzo2/InibkSt 3facO5XOu4ecMghOF61twN32HwIyhkzEep9/kMcFBZ5RM/agFFh66v84rw58PH6wmnoz KoBA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.137.201 with SMTP id qk9mr1344145pbb.199.1377088475780; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.25.36 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:04:35 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setting zookeeper timeout to higher value From: Vimal Jain To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e3f2e6c5c8c04e4746595 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b2e3f2e6c5c8c04e4746595 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 yeah .. its mentioned so in official guide but currently i am using it in production and would later convert it to 3-node cluster. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote: > Hi Vimal, > > I'm talking about your HBase installationg. I guessed that a pseudo > distributed distributed HBase installation is for testing purposes, and not > to sustain a production load. > > JM > > 2013/8/21 Vimal Jain > > > Hi Jean, > > Sorry , but i did not get you completely. > > When you say its for testing , what exactly it means ? > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi Vimal, > > > > > > It's for testing only, so you can put what ever value you want ;) > > > > > > It might just take longer because HBase see that RS is down. But as I > > said, > > > it's for testing. So it's not really critical. > > > > > > You might also want to play with GC options to make it faster. > > > > > > JM > > > > > > 2013/8/21 Vimal Jain > > > > > > > Can someone please give advice on this ? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Vimal Jain > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > I am running Hbase in pseudo distributed mode on top HDFS. > > > > > Recently , i was facing problems related to long GC pauses. > > > > > When i read in official documentation , its suggested to increase > > > > > zookeeper timeout. > > > > > > > > > > I am planning to make it 10 minutes .I understand the risk of > > > increasing > > > > > timeout means it takes a while for master to assign new > regionserver > > in > > > > > case of a RS failure. > > > > > But as i am running Pseudo distributed mode , there is only one RS > > and > > > > > even if it goes down my entire system is down , so increasing > timeout > > > > does > > > > > not seems to be an issue in my case.But still , i would like > expert's > > > > > advice on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my hbase-site.xml :- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * > > > > > zookeeper.session.timeout > > > > > 600000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hbase.zookeeper.property.tickTime > > > > > 30000 > > > > > * > > > > > > > > > > hbase.rootdir > > > > > hdfs://192.168.20.30:9000/hbase > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hbase.cluster.distributed > > > > > true > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hbase.zookeeper.quorum > > > > > 192.168.20.30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dfs.replication > > > > > 1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hbase.zookeeper.property.clientPort > > > > > 2181 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hbase.zookeeper.property.dataDir > > > > > /home/hadoop/HbaseData/zookeeper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > > Vimal Jain > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > Vimal Jain > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards, > > Vimal Jain > > > -- Thanks and Regards, Vimal Jain --047d7b2e3f2e6c5c8c04e4746595--