Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBABF10F93 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84152 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2013 11:36:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 83976 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2013 11:36:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 83966 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2013 11:36:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:36:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.49] (HELO mail-pb0-f49.google.com) (209.85.160.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:36:27 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id jt11so9759279pbb.8 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=c1oo4e+PRUQiuELPHGz+SXiI5o3yJAn4hFyLyE9cDUs=; b=UNBhDKlC2Wpu92OueiPLhFAq9xpY4WYNpBcKtpxSnsLKDJJW5mlBjFK+aMUSfS1XVE KAfiIatUySyTBWg8Jo6cnIB9EVFrF76dk1G+oPeOLyUWQ0pugiEWyZwpIEIh6fDqokzA 2yh55sV9xeNArf3kL6pWVWT0uQhVT6kMfqWV2SYsaHsO5cpSHsBDn+xzHtSj/4TKIwxy cJXVPPksXv/KgYgMO/UTfXlIH0+ki4I1wMZ/cvr18UCN60ETxo/QRezu+HJ+hTO1Yise QnEGPd5e2mefnY9W1pBWxDOGs/2J0FNVqie21QpxJFdokqklynnhhd7csQh3aSIH6a33 7BNg== X-Received: by 10.66.16.197 with SMTP id i5mr3796572pad.51.1373715367308; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.14] (c-24-130-233-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.233.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nr8sm39295019pbc.6.2013.07.13.04.36.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:36:03 -0700 (PDT) References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8BD7D476-B8F9-4788-867D-51D231346D28@gmail.com> Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B146) From: Ted Yu Subject: Re: the scan will be executed parallel if not use coprocessor? Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:36:01 -0700 To: "user@hbase.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Can you clarify your question a little bit ? That is, are you expecting parallel scan within region boundary or across bo= undaries ? Cheers On Jul 13, 2013, at 1:43 AM, ch huang wrote: > ATT