Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9F49107E7 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60466 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2013 19:21:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 60404 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2013 19:21:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 60396 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2013 19:21:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:21:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of patrick.schless@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.169] (HELO mail-ie0-f169.google.com) (209.85.223.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:21:12 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 10so7913035ied.14 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:20:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=x0Y7SKHHLRkrqC1cAVoSkjfl3WxInF3L41i2hj57adw=; b=f/UGN4ebF3yxzU9bI4pB46a4o+Uiotd/ukePT8tZ04B82Re2c9mngI99xaxJzqINYp 9+JJ42iUeE9OnalzXshQKXITD5KG1lQ7sJDgexYvEaZdo7m/UWEpcPRhqukHbyx/x4yf JSgRdWcBiDjtTnJLFOGE2Fs/PEQU0Qge/e5biuQm+YBEx5c63sLPCMf7jIBCPIiXtdF8 cLTa2Akhg4hHTluRdvJKMTsPorPcxWqkdkyV+LOER/58b02Lw0aCz+Jpsc0rWKYxpTgi j15XFqLqC7ZSaQ0v4f5iHI3kW9KE4JRTACo3GuPoqFj1Jl/BSMhX2+KZPVlSTDT2TxfJ AdqQ== X-Received: by 10.50.118.72 with SMTP id kk8mr5668524igb.13.1371496852069; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:20:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.104.5 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:20:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Schless Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:20:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: CopyTable To: user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0112cedcadb10804df5e7e92 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0112cedcadb10804df5e7e92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Context: I'm working on getting replication set up, and a prerequisite for me is to rename the table (since you have to replicate to the same name as the source). For this, I'm testing a CopyTable strategy, since there doesn't seem to be a good way to rename a table (please correct me if I'm wrong). My question: According to [1], the CopyTable job takes an argument "all.cells" which "Also copy delete markers and uncollected deleted cells (advanced option)." I'm confused by the "advanced option" bit. When would you not want to copy deletes over to a new table? Without that, it seems like you could end up with more data than you were expecting in the target table. Any info would be helpful. Thanks, Patrick [1] http://hbase.apache.org/book/ops_mgt.html#copytable --089e0112cedcadb10804df5e7e92--