Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPQV63U8=w24ETP-=NjJM__e5f_vS4xEk3k49j-Wqc7=kGeZ=w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAEoZr1mTbKWno47a2BBFUQGvg1-cV3JgukVE_GE1W7=7krQtgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPQV63U8=w24ETP-=NjJM__e5f_vS4xEk3k49j-Wqc7=kGeZ=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:10:28 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAEoZr1=LcgCqPkVh2hezSekdfc6QEoqwDPOXrfVepdQoveeScQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Slow scan request with basic test ?
From: Simon Majou <simon@majou.org>
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec547c97bac746204df1ea57b

--bcaec547c97bac746204df1ea57b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

I am using the latest stable (0.94.8), I have a i3 laptop with a SSD.

I am doing the basic test of the documentation :
http://hbase.apache.org/book/quickstart.html#shell_exercises

hbase(main):003:0> create 'test', 'cf'
0 row(s) in 1.2200 seconds
hbase(main):003:0> list 'test'
..
1 row(s) in 0.0550 seconds
hbase(main):004:0> put 'test', 'row1', 'cf:a', 'value1'
0 row(s) in 0.0560 seconds
hbase(main):005:0> put 'test', 'row2', 'cf:b', 'value2'
0 row(s) in 0.0370 seconds
hbase(main):006:0> put 'test', 'row3', 'cf:c', 'value3'
0 row(s) in 0.0450 seconds


Here is what I got :

create 'test', 'cf'
create 'test', 'cf'
0 row(s) in 9.1360 seconds

list 'test'
list 'test'
TABLE
test
1 row(s) in 0.0280 seconds

put 'test', 'row1', 'cf:a', 'value1'
put 'test', 'row1', 'cf:a', 'value1'
0 row(s) in 4.6200 seconds

put 'test', 'row2', 'cf:b', 'value2'
put 'test', 'row2', 'cf:b', 'value2'
0 row(s) in 0.0080 seconds

put 'test', 'row3', 'cf:c', 'value3'
put 'test', 'row3', 'cf:c', 'value3'
0 row(s) in 0.0060 seconds

scan 'test'
scan 'test'
ROW  COLUMN+CELL
 row1 column=cf:a, timestamp=1371222264939, value=value1
 row2 column=cf:b, timestamp=1371222269032, value=value2
 row3 column=cf:c, timestamp=1371222275823, value=value3
3 row(s) in 4.5920 seconds


It seems to have some ~4.5s latency, appearing 2x when creating a table,
and appearing on the first put and on scans.

Simon


Simon


On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:

> Hi Simon,
>
> Can you please provide more details? Which version are you testing
> with, what is the test you are doing, on what kind of computer this is
> running?
>
> Thanks,
>
> JM
>
> 2013/6/14 Simon Majou <simon@majou.org>:
> > Hello,
> >
> > When doing the basic test after installing, the scan request is really
> slow
> > (~5sec). There are no errors in the logs. Is it normal ? Why it is so ?
> >
> > Simon
>

--bcaec547c97bac746204df1ea57b--