Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9091100F9 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74929 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2013 06:22:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 74769 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2013 06:22:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 74760 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2013 06:22:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:22:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.54] (HELO mail-bk0-f54.google.com) (209.85.214.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 06:22:18 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id it19so1344120bkc.13 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 23:21:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ouTje3tvrqKQxECHY00xqNhv1B5aBkreUeZ/lnw2XAc=; b=tBvKuglKIyQcd3c3KHl9BzkRji+sVkTl49SMmIoQc/H7wepoIvs9s4jZWLzgozVEbv GyDhIs+i/YiUDGUO1SJd/OhJJA+7djPx76tLm/DdF71l8mmJ5Kzf16AV3RcO6gRCJBuB smLCVDM6GE9B+Ks+waXVfFayPvETS1viwdP7+Z30ez3Udbggi/4IGxxJ2rt17OllbblL CwP95IOxZpIHdBzWLAaebPAS5KDbyB31Ocfmvp3VP5GYxngT4r8DoKZbuZEZqv8hs48F vyLVq77pRtiF5+yFDwJOx3NTptIzL1wPBr5BKxnt7hrI/QRwwZoYEW9Wm4BPBynRh52+ fOWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.205.115.73 with SMTP id fd9mr10565848bkc.58.1370499717484; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 23:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.37.134 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:21:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 08:21:57 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NpPA3blGG8ercabQ3KLzgnLqKhw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Region servers going down under heavy write load From: Stack To: Hbase-User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9c0971cd3915b04de7654b6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae9c0971cd3915b04de7654b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Stack wrote: > >> >> bq. increase tickTime in zoo.cfg? >> >> For shared zookeeper quorum, the above should be done. >> >> > What? > > What I meant to say is, how does this answer the question "Is this even relevant anymore? hbase.zookeeper.property.tickTime ?"? St.Ack --14dae9c0971cd3915b04de7654b6--