Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5766A10B8A for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 18:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53639 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2013 18:00:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 53467 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2013 18:00:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 53458 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2013 18:00:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:00:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.51] (HELO mail-qa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.216.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:00:47 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id hu16so1617894qab.10 for ; Mon, 06 May 2013 11:00:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=W1JkOLzLzTRuknsrXNCfUTwy4bsrh4ZnWTsJYw2RgsI=; b=kzYtizC3ZR3h7+NJO+/p1caQCLsFXMnM62kq9eRVeu1ct3wpGxZuFz58tm9w2tN7yo ZL4yns3RrdLrmL1yJK1TBtkGQ5MtnxUgIDP2evvj8B+y5mrLEt4bX2+AXKFdy128KUO+ KCL4S3JB8UHektW+FT4XS2RnxG4mEbJZbIdGjWC6u+0iqKIma2bXcI1+RHFKIxN/mkx+ PoVg5xWfQFaUnek5EeOkYK9Qgy6uYx3RSULesQtYNr0it92tKUuhPAcGehr9Izkm/RaP hbfR+mlmfGOPE5f6hReqK0SU2cRw0iQxFW7FCjezeeAIMGcpZhWZbM7cQuJ6MIxCtjcO j8SA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.162.209 with SMTP id w17mr5604245qcx.42.1367863226950; Mon, 06 May 2013 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.190.194 with HTTP; Mon, 6 May 2013 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 14:00:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBase cluster over multiple EC2 Availability Zones? From: Otis Gospodnetic To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Re traffic and free vs. not free - Amandeep was right - according to http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/#DataTransfer it's NOT free. The AWS person I recently spoke to about this told me it was free, but I guess it's not! Otis -- Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html HBASE Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi, > > Actually, cross-AZ traffic is actually free. It's cross-Region > traffic that's not free. I realize the cross-AZ (translates to > cross-DC) traffic will be slower, but I wonder if there are any HBase > (or HDFS)-specific reasons why one should not attempt to do this? > > Thanks, > Otis > -- > Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html > HBASE Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > > > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Amandeep Khurana wrote: >> I've not come across anyone spanning clusters cross AZ. You pay for cross >> AZ traffic and the link is slower than within a single AZ. >> >> Amandeep >> >> >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < >> otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Do people spread HBase clusters over multiple EC2 Availability Zones, >>> or is that a big no-no? Cross-AZ communication is supposedly going >>> over fast fiber optic cables. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Otis >>> -- >>> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html >>> HBASE Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html >>>