Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 861BFF616 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 02:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64489 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2013 02:43:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 64426 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2013 02:43:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 64418 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2013 02:43:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 May 2013 02:43:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcosluis2186@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.174] (HELO mail-ob0-f174.google.com) (209.85.214.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 May 2013 02:43:30 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id dn14so1272776obc.33 for ; Tue, 07 May 2013 19:43:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bDVGltF5vPr8HXXkzybqinIESXAJhh8p6S+Z5+nLPkA=; b=ryfFtyAyiRYSak4JzA0TRweydntLatXBCT1n8u1vpLGaj6HN81l0ZLZ145vySBP6cq 8w9qffzHVsW6Yt5PPRbvxsl9N5cHimu5k9iVghXo3KZVYFy5wXJ3sbinBBA/JxSfVDjp cWvDbpCepEfH4qNzOloBFMcpspENi3aXYv8j445YmyZgr633t6Q5iu3SXiJDP0Elxqso J4wbb6PXSwfZOgx/zaIpiXF7+xbCJHnltfYuzXFzMyMbvepXgJsZamz89YF/EjB/QOBJ cKriX5l/Ufxyqvze4R4fbNn4F1XB19XiCBrYcb7LvXigsGY6pk0KXH0fL01mE0z9JMfF rQCg== X-Received: by 10.182.233.227 with SMTP id tz3mr1408426obc.23.1367980990215; Tue, 07 May 2013 19:43:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.26.39 with HTTP; Tue, 7 May 2013 19:42:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 22:12:50 -0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: EC2 Elastic MapReduce HBase install recommendations To: "paul.konyves" Cc: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2029afb88ce04dc2be48b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2029afb88ce04dc2be48b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think that you when you are talking about RMap, you are referring to MapR=B4s distribution. I think that MapR=B4s team released a very good version of its Hadoop distribution focused on HBase called M7. You can see its overview here: http://www.mapr.com/products/mapr-editions/m7-edition But this release was under beta testing, and I see that it=B4s not included in the Amazon Marketplace yet: https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/seller-profile?id=3D802b0a25-877e-4b57-9= 007-a3fd284815a5 2013/5/7 Pal Konyves > Hi, > > Has anyone got some recommendations about running HBase on EC2? I am > testing it, and so far I am very disappointed with it. I did not change > anything about the default 'Amazon distribution' installation. It has one > MasterNode and two slave nodes, and write performance is around 2500 smal= l > rows per sec at most, but I expected it to be way better. Oh, and this i= s > with batch put operations with autocommit turned off, where each batch > containes about 500-1000 rows... When I do it with autocommit, it does no= t > even reach the 1000 rows per sec. > > Every nodes were m1.Large ones. > > Any experiences, suggestions? Is it worth to try the RMap distribution > instead of the amazon one? > > Thanks, > Pal > --=20 Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda Product Manager at PDVSA http://about.me/marcosortiz --001a11c2029afb88ce04dc2be48b--