Return-Path: 
 <user-return-34527-apmail-hbase-user-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47A039CE5
	for <apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  4 Mar 2013 11:52:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 30501 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2013 11:51:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29999 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2013 11:51:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29810 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2013 11:51:25 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:51:25 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rmorgan466@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.53 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.219.53] (HELO mail-oa0-f53.google.com) (209.85.219.53)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:51:19 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so8980705oag.12
        for <user@hbase.apache.org>; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:50:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=meLFVCR5IOtOOfd3SiOe/CkxU3m2WskdGlCyiJgXz10=;
        b=hvL7r1EKAVOl8/6uCb7ogxCcKADM2Vak86cKNapjqRYPs6kJM2mN887JVt5ULFTbWK
         hEaVDroKcegv5WeEcub9lZ7INSg96E8J4V85UiYZhdtFETQbCiUwW0PwhL1/SjyPMxzl
         b7xDnGHYIJhmzB9A4VCa3BvDMh42arOxlQ33h+kf9aU2Z0I9GhM2e1BBuoXLyds4jmug
         LIowKRoQkOq9+nlkHOWzNrwHTOELcTFNxwtS3TdAQPI3/HAPBxTJF9GceABEDwatBGJs
         t4sW9T+fpkRb6GQpKAgJRQR0LXfhsEz7GhGSOrwKqRmcx92uwlqcyj/dxnyaQ2bVURC0
         +BKA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.169.231 with SMTP id ah7mr14988092oec.142.1362397858233;
 Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:50:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.24.196 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 03:50:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 06:50:58 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAOF-KfhahLf-x=QyWSxAc2aK9+UUJtdkBHDCsaDcNrf7tc8-ag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: discp versus export
From: Rita <rmorgan466@gmail.com>
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee6086205be04d717f832
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--bcaec54ee6086205be04d717f832
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

is it better to do a distcp or export table?

distcp is much faster but it seems export is preferred, is that correct?


-- 
--- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.--

--bcaec54ee6086205be04d717f832--