Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE96CFE6D for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91125 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2013 18:25:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 91068 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2013 18:25:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 91059 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2013 18:25:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:25:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.181] (HELO mail-wi0-f181.google.com) (209.85.212.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:25:19 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hj8so3348756wib.8 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:24:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bhfbN4F+BJ98cq4bm8dL2kUWKSDP1u+TMlf/nqY4+X0=; b=kGIGfOOz/nAo+CE3z6b+Jn1EvD/+x3JxVcSRFCXwajcoCrdCJ6bktsGL5PIg5sUp86 UgpVkmWGOQxvrrFP9bWfCzUkNTLGYiC7B9l752EoRYuzwFRMUr2yyJ249eIgPX3i8gOd oYGAuhMZYdbKqhQ+oDs7xFWr1+eyKkexQtSl8gBEONAmmMhoW6E0EJRWBze0EVWCebFX oBgsufM/r5iDKb7iNvuutME6eEQjUQa+J8L3msuT+zsYXRFyVFmnaskhLCOOFLL0zwA5 sUXPHL1EwJy1/n5knAplK7PyVhsOR+BDbQg4R54iVVO3DxOHnHUr+R/WoZGP62OWSJHt wtXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.79.6 with SMTP id f6mr27352884wix.26.1364235898145; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.35.130 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51BE77A7231E9E488E58380AFBD7727225EF194C@mail1.impetus.co.in> References: <51BE77A7231E9E488E58380AFBD7727225EF1879@mail1.impetus.co.in> <51BE77A7231E9E488E58380AFBD7727225EF18C6@mail1.impetus.co.in> <51BE77A7231E9E488E58380AFBD7727225EF194C@mail1.impetus.co.in> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:24:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBase Writes With Large Number of Columns From: Ted Yu To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: "ankitjaincs06@gmail.com" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044282481955df04d8c3ecd5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d044282481955df04d8c3ecd5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Final clarification: bq. I am writing 1.5 KB of data per row across 40 columns. So your schema is not sparse - you were writing to (all) 40 columns in second case. Thanks On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Pankaj Misra wrote: > Yes Ted, you are right, we are having table regions pre-split, and we see > that both regions are almost evenly filled in both the tests. > > This does not seem to be a regression though, since we were getting good > write rates when we had lesser number of columns. > > Thanks and Regards > Pankaj Misra > > > ________________________________________ > From: Ted Yu [yuzhihong@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 11:15 PM > To: user@hbase.apache.org > Cc: ankitjaincs06@gmail.com > Subject: Re: HBase Writes With Large Number of Columns > > Copying Ankit who raised the same question soon after Pankaj's initial > question. > > On one hand I wonder if this was a regression in 0.94.5 (though unlikely). > > Did the region servers receive (relatively) same write load for the second > test case ? I assume you have pre-split your tables in both cases. > > Cheers > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Pankaj Misra > wrote: > > > Hi Ted, > > > > Sorry for missing that detail, we are using HBase version 0.94.5 > > > > Regards > > Pankaj Misra > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Ted Yu [yuzhihong@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:29 PM > > To: user@hbase.apache.org > > Subject: Re: HBase Writes With Large Number of Columns > > > > If you give us the version of HBase you're using, that would give us some > > more information to help you. > > > > Cheers > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Pankaj Misra < > pankaj.misra@impetus.co.in > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The issue that I am facing is around the performance drop of Hbase, > when > > I > > > was having 20 columns in a column family Vs now when I am having 40 > > columns > > > in a column family. The number of columns have doubled and the > > > ingestion/write speed has also dropped by half. I am writing 1.5 KB of > > data > > > per row across 40 columns. > > > > > > Are there any settings that I should look into for tweaking Hbase to > > write > > > higher number of columns faster? > > > > > > I would request community's help to let me know how can I write to a > > > column family with large number of columns efficiently. > > > > > > Would greatly appreciate any help /clues around this issue. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Pankaj Misra > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, > > > proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is > > > intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please > > > destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when > > > received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or > guarantee, > > > that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that > the > > > communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, > > proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is > > intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please > > destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when > > received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, > > that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the > > communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, > proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is > intended solely for the named addressee. If received in error, please > destroy and notify the sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when > received in error. Impetus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, > that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the > communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. > --f46d044282481955df04d8c3ecd5--