hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From kiran <kiran.sarvabho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Miserable Performance of gets
Date Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:00:04 GMT
Yes we profiled the gets after completing the scan only. We have 12
regionservers. Each table i am doing gets has 40 regions.


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:36 PM, kiran <kiran.sarvabhotla@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I had some miserable experience with gets (batch gets) in hbase. I have
> two
> > tables with different rowkeys, columns are distributed across the two
> > tables.
> >
> > Currently what I am doing is scan over one table and get all the rowkeys
> in
> > the first table matching my filter. Then issue a batch get on another
> table
> > to retrieve some columns. But even for 20 gets, the performance is like
> > miserable (almost a second or two for 20 gets which is not acceptable).
> > But, scanning even on few thousands of rows is getting completed in
> > milliseconds.
> >
> >
> What happens if you do those 20 batch gets in isolation, apart from the
> scan?  Do you still have miserable performance?
>
> What is your cluster setup like?  How many nodes?  How many regions?
>
>
>
> > My concern is for about 20 gets if it takes second or two,
> > How can it scale ??
> >
>
> Normally it does not take this long.  Lets figure out what is going on on
> your setup.
>
> St.Ack
>



-- 
Thank you
Kiran Sarvabhotla

-----Even a correct decision is wrong when it is taken late

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message