hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From kiran <kiran.sarvabho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Miserable Performance of gets
Date Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:01:28 GMT
And the regions are well distributed acroos the 12 regionservers.....


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:30 PM, kiran <kiran.sarvabhotla@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes we profiled the gets after completing the scan only. We have 12
> regionservers. Each table i am doing gets has 40 regions.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:36 PM, kiran <kiran.sarvabhotla@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > I had some miserable experience with gets (batch gets) in hbase. I have
>> two
>> > tables with different rowkeys, columns are distributed across the two
>> > tables.
>> >
>> > Currently what I am doing is scan over one table and get all the
>> rowkeys in
>> > the first table matching my filter. Then issue a batch get on another
>> table
>> > to retrieve some columns. But even for 20 gets, the performance is like
>> > miserable (almost a second or two for 20 gets which is not acceptable).
>> > But, scanning even on few thousands of rows is getting completed in
>> > milliseconds.
>> >
>> >
>> What happens if you do those 20 batch gets in isolation, apart from the
>> scan?  Do you still have miserable performance?
>>
>> What is your cluster setup like?  How many nodes?  How many regions?
>>
>>
>>
>> > My concern is for about 20 gets if it takes second or two,
>> > How can it scale ??
>> >
>>
>> Normally it does not take this long.  Lets figure out what is going on on
>> your setup.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you
> Kiran Sarvabhotla
>
> -----Even a correct decision is wrong when it is taken late
>
>


-- 
Thank you
Kiran Sarvabhotla

-----Even a correct decision is wrong when it is taken late

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message