Return-Path: 
 <user-return-33219-apmail-hbase-user-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3159CE4A5
	for <apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:03:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 27121 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2013 13:03:57 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 27035 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2013 13:03:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 27001 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2013 13:03:55 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:03:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.42] (HELO mail-pb0-f42.google.com) (209.85.160.42)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:03:47 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rp2so1401198pbb.29
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:03:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date
         :to;
        bh=ONs2x3SVHuIoTaZ7iTkeSkgsCGdrotGwbgUxzx376To=;
        b=EdR30KHaqLyki5/oEM0qJ95gyz07fe3YW8uPaijIRTRA0FcW2Zn3+zWc+bKu8gR2fU
         wxm0LXw9K546CJeSVNMp4uqlZux54DPgzmtWfBInNe71hLN1nAqynJN8kej7ZHICBOEX
         j2Dj49BfRGd3ilNEhN96vVuvTM/6yeHwoQ8RhWRGcH8BhM7NWfSfFkItVCx00bgNV8AT
         Y4x+x+L+ZszDHc7Z+ZimrY5+YkBzizp66ksRHYtFyZ5wHqvbwsIuZQIPIayED6pvvWp3
         D6hbKF0yiN780DKzntwkcSqZhwFtCJPbrggjvzXpFTWYKm2lNdggu2mHCLuW+7KSiWSi
         ELzg==
X-Received: by 10.66.80.68 with SMTP id p4mr13468535pax.35.1358427807579;
        Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-130-233-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.
 [24.130.233.55])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id is3sm1059994pbc.6.2013.01.17.05.03.25
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:03:26 -0800 (PST)
References: 
 <CAC7depe+TzDdGJxJ2h_EL4ihvGppb_tTcn5Vc0E7v-TrSgWnaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <89E153FD-F132-4AF2-87B4-977E03FB681A@gmail.com>
 <CAC7depdF8UmYV=WEUmfbLJQx0XapX9KrG1MkbATz=58s0g7-zw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAC7depdF8UmYV=WEUmfbLJQx0XapX9KrG1MkbATz=58s0g7-zw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E6688FC8-275A-4211-ADD7-392E35E38B91@gmail.com>
Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>,
 "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A525)
From: Ted <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How to upgrade HBase from 0.90.5 to 0.94
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:03:24 -0800
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

With the version gap I don't think bulk load can be used directly.=20

Do the two clusters have same set of tables ?
Is the 0.90 cluster serving write load actively ?

Thanks

On Jan 17, 2013, at 1:00 AM, Mickey <huanfeng388@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Ted.
> If I have another cluster already installed with hbase 0.94.4, can I
> migrate the data from the original hbase 0.90 cluster to the new cluster?
> Is it possible to do something like bulk load?
>=20
> Best regards,
> Mickey
>=20
> 2013/1/15 Ted <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
>=20
>> You can upgrade to 0.92.2 first, followed by upgrade to 0.94.4
>>=20
>> Please consider upgrading Hadoop to 1.0.4 as well
>>=20
>> Thanks
>>=20
>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 4:47 AM, =E5=B9=BB=E9=A3=8E <huanfeng388@gmail.com> w=
rote:
>>=20
>>> Hi, everybody,
>>>=20
>>> I want to upgrade a HBase cluster from 0.90.5 to 0.94. The cluster has
>>> about 50 nodes and the hadoop version is 0.20.2.
>>> Is there an easy way to do it? Shutdown is acceptable and what I really
>>> care is the safety of the data.
>>> Hope for your suggestions.
>>>=20
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mickey
>>=20