Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nkeywal@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPcDmSvr41VB17kXQ4EZpzhk=X_ipUg3Y2EJNe=bRpmW0Ah-mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPQV63WX0HsTind7AXdOhJ=FEB7RxP=GKy8xa_zgS7iWx=CJGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62waf7SL7v-ojit6j5TwPmmkYDcQOKuYYgHFTFDEziaCfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPQV63UhjRdmRfzM62=efv2agGLSJBj0v4m0Gc+netP8FYD+pw@mail.gmail.com>
 <E3B7FA5A-D452-475E-ADD5-ED5C8D0D35CA@yahoo-inc.com>
 <CAPQV63W_ieT683CWVYs-v_cCVGjshcmzN0PFnpP0jnr+2CmM3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPcDmSvr41VB17kXQ4EZpzhk=X_ipUg3Y2EJNe=bRpmW0Ah-mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:19:40 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAPcDmSu_DLo3vb8njjk1cVnApEsm-3YaehEmu7iRcYVfQvHJiw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How to run HBase tests against 0.94? (seems to be for and old
 version of HBase)
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042f96fccc209804d25174d7

--f46d042f96fccc209804d25174d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>From what I see in 0.94 and in the jira, it should work, there is nothing
fancy there.

moving to dev list btw, user in bcc.


On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com> wrote:

> If it works, it's ok: it's not going to give you wrong results. Just that
> it adds nothing to a plain mvn test.
> So if it worked for you on this patch, then you're done :-).
>
> This should be enough most most cases:
> mvn test
>
> If you want to play it safe, you will run all the tests before sending the
> patch.
> That's mvn test -P runAllTests
>
> And this should work. If you have a strange error, you can clean the env
> with a mvn clean install -DskipTests.
>
> 'P runAllTests' adds some extra tests and increases the parallelization,
> but does not change the environment.
>
>
> I'm gonna have a look at the JIRA you're working on to see if there
> something that could explain the issue you're having.
>
>
>  On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
>> for my code validation? What's the right way to run the tests on 0.94?
>
>
>

--f46d042f96fccc209804d25174d7--