Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAMYKhp0bKvVbZy2b9VgzDK5Y6VZx=1+tMBinUQz-t+CRsk=7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALte62w4WjZntBsxBBexCG92hrW2OZGQgi_-pP_P3bPG=93rnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1358994226.69218.YahooMailNeo@web140602.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<CAAMYKhp0bKvVbZy2b9VgzDK5Y6VZx=1+tMBinUQz-t+CRsk=7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:39:01 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62zkMyE2G+L2rHwtOcDNewAfgs5F1wQnDzQq7G0ydYu02A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HBASE-7114 Increment does not extend Mutation but probably should
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0408d6d933d4f504d42645c5

--f46d0408d6d933d4f504d42645c5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Amit:
Can you tell us what operation you perform on the returned family map ?

Thanks

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Amit Sela <amits@infolinks.com> wrote:

> I'm using Increment.getFamilyMap in a postIncrement Observer.
> I'm running with HBase 0.94.2.
>
> Amit.
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:23 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > The reason was that Increment was serialized differently (compared to all
> > other mutations).
> > In trunk that is no longer an issue, since the serialization logic is no
> > longer part of the object to be serialized.
> >
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:25 AM
> > Subject: HBASE-7114 Increment does not extend Mutation but probably
> should
> >
> > Hi,
> > I want to get opinion on whether we should proceed with HBASE-7114
> > 'Increment does not extend Mutation but probably should' in trunk.
> >
> > Is anyone using Increment.setWriteToWAL or Increment.getFamilyMap ?
> > For Increment.setWriteToWAL, are you using the Increment returned ?
> >
> > Your feedback would be appreciated.
> >
>

--f46d0408d6d933d4f504d42645c5--