Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA3CAD8CE for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 02:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3557 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2012 02:53:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 3264 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2012 02:53:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 3241 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2012 02:53:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 02:53:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.223.169] (HELO mail-ie0-f169.google.com) (209.85.223.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 02:53:42 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c14so4119904ieb.14 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:53:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=zp6VXNZCdiVw2K8v05U6QjnY8F/wcuNubVLWXFhloI8=; b=chzrnRyjafrXKoMo+n7EiSMUT2b/1MZhFzexETPQxJYAXjBE91DW1fXy5lJS4n9Gs4 Loq7Aw3Tq/SxKhvupSpWsXY1Xowrx7X2/A2+b7v8dkY+rJZA7Jgda0g8AC0FTXNPL3uo GLXalTqJ/8Vfuh9DuOtsBdCwkO+vcaBTDaHHbAbm3JtU1SCCqXuR+B4wxt6sib0i/wAG /9pOq3cLs9O/T/lrdTwgpI4XDhhheOr1y2orLwbf8Ng2+CPfIrclONPFggv/59WOmagL GwuFpaLoDSFHV/Xv8otNGIEw9LdrnSJywxuqvesFYVGdjtPec6gmKz3BEhTx3noiictu +HBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.135.1 with SMTP id po1mr5011024igb.56.1354503201019; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:53:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.97.36 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 18:53:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 21:53:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Put while move or split From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQla0Gup65yynGyh5e14oaBqvlq6OoQTk7c1j9uqQonu3eL2E+fOd46Dy0YmSHs2eNbdWee9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok. so if on the client side I'm "simply" using Puts, scans and gets fron the HTableInterface, I don't have to worry about that since it will retry. But I still should consider catching exceptions when regions are not available because the region server is down for less than 3 minutes, right? Thanks, JM 2012/12/2, Nicolas Liochon : > It's not accessible, but it's more or less transparent (latency impact > aside) for the end user: the hbase client will retry the operation. > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote: > >> ? >