Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F666E63D for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 08:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68954 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2012 08:22:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 68814 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2012 08:22:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 68785 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2012 08:22:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:22:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anoop.hbase@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.41] (HELO mail-oa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.219.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 08:22:27 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so1589046oag.14 for ; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:22:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tXGygQdUwKMQ6lCCJONJWfV5bc7zxOCVzr7HxlE1Fu8=; b=OH7C7IIGzPQ7fDCS/9H8157AtgE5nBWxZmD/Xim63DBZOyUxUbHpCAtrR2naqHUyc9 s5pkXT6gP4Rqv0yDgbCnN6rTdD8uoyqm/i3sGGBNFWZzbOol0cIyTEJlCA4IbrL16Ymb h8jF0BQ//QoY8IAQOimSPswE0JAcK9NTB2+4nQQoIHonKsRYHtDQIVGYcxXi7VR+3wGp w7uKy04cYdBVRN4uYAzBpYUXqafMQ5r/wPP8NJ89fp+CT9ODWRxXOIoyQm/TfrDGGYX4 go0wq9kmCC6SHvxxacZs6RtjM9jUZmWi3WAYjVtXRb0713Zk1zPgthHp2pRyTn3y1oL/ UM8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.171.41 with SMTP id ar9mr3392696oec.16.1354350126378; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:22:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.74.106 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 00:22:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 13:52:06 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Coprocessor slow down problem! From: Anoop John To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54b4a702f2dbb04cfc63650 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec54b4a702f2dbb04cfc63650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ram, This issue was for prePut().. postPut() was fine only... Can you take a look that at the time of slow put what the corresponding RS threads doing. May be can get some clues from that. -Anoop- On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:04 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan < ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Pls check if this issue is similar to HBASE-5897. It is fixed in 0.92.2 as > i see from the fix versions. > > Regards > Ram > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:13 PM, yonghu wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I have two tables, named test and tracking. For every put in the test > > table, I defined a postPut trigger to insert the same data into > > tracking table. I tested about 50 thousands tuples. The strange thing > > for me is for the first 20 thousands tuples, the speed is very fast (I > > made 5 times tests, every time is the same). And then, after that, the > > insertion to tracking table will be every slow, probably 2-3 rows/sec. > > My hbase version is 0.92.0. Can anyone tell me why and how I can > > increase the speed? > > > > regards! > > > > Yong > > > --bcaec54b4a702f2dbb04cfc63650--