Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DDF3E99A for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73936 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2012 15:54:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73892 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2012 15:54:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73884 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2012 15:54:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:54:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anoop.hbase@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.170] (HELO mail-ob0-f170.google.com) (209.85.214.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:54:50 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so8981806obc.1 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:54:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MsIm73oD6AtJT5oOMwm9vAy4Pq/W2UHo/hSslxjHry0=; b=x9tR30WE2o4gs0uRGO1hhw7dMnPvkrFoEcktvpRWl/whXDWTuz7CvNXsUmcHwPIddL /1rPPLhYjIyF2leX4//7iriRSnFMTUq7ub6MaO1suJYuRzJPHZiIDk+Y6KgDUT0jTxqV zaFN7bw2hDehO/inPueGLfMJHrPATR1txwToT6oi6jyHY7x5iVsZwGapc7xl6yyx5QGp /Oe9EgwcPoq3/YDLfgpduzHvyNI8G1/iWpGQHUXE/9mX4e5z6U4qfdRhc0WqhHzLLuse 7aAISVMyoSSRrm0tFisd07V2iBuJJA9sWzFTjF5itIPY9l6z2vJGwyEhePqXcaKPqtiQ veEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.4.35 with SMTP id h3mr13611906oeh.123.1356623670002; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:54:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.74.106 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:54:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0CE69E9126D0344088798A3B7F7F80863AEA0620@SZXEML553-MBX.china.huawei.com> <0CE69E9126D0344088798A3B7F7F80863AEA52D9@SZXEML553-MBX.china.huawei.com> <0CE69E9126D0344088798A3B7F7F80863AEAABF3@SZXEML553-MBX.china.huawei.com> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:24:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBase - Secondary Index From: Anoop John To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff2534af1c3ec04d1d78fd9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8ff2534af1c3ec04d1d78fd9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >how the massive number of get() is going to perform againt the main table Didnt follow u completely here. There wont be any get() happening.. As the exact rowkey in a region we get from the index table, we can seek to the exact position and return that row. -Anoop- On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Shengjie Min wrote: > how the massive number of get() is going to > perform againt the main table > --e89a8ff2534af1c3ec04d1d78fd9--