Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56B61D1F6 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85175 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2012 15:29:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 85118 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2012 15:29:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 85099 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2012 15:29:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:29:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nkeywal@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.169] (HELO mail-lb0-f169.google.com) (209.85.217.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:29:06 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id gk1so10592266lbb.14 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:28:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=PaYAu6/2cgLZckpscOOjStVeu2O9yIikf/P9dJKoYyc=; b=wcuYvir2sShAdT0I/SwrXmmHmwaGnikopXZW6ppHBFoAMEUnI2Uapa2InlyjhGI2oN kusnSFu5H0OpZY1oH9Ppzl6IwohbBWl6ZFoBVXv4Qw+IKBjhfSaIP4rPfTOuhzebSdOx /5cIKfVRRHvgCkuBGGwqRvi+AMOjAnHR26tt6PE5qzF3T2se/rHFUMnQy0s1jEe5as1H Jj/Q/ZUojukU0Aj6mw6hEDr56bnP2MsMP1SboVnLvMdmxB4WUii8twTBKBW5KBtNerpz s7CS8TYiIW8K269qCmZlDt1gIclu/6AmNInOpJPfJN8qMqFlPQzdeiH+Tju6SiynEYfG Qn8w== Received: by 10.152.106.237 with SMTP id gx13mr11229350lab.46.1353943725508; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:28:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.8.9 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:28:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1353875832706-4034362.post@n3.nabble.com> From: Nicolas Liochon Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:28:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Connecting to standalone HBase from a remote client To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04071613ce086004cf67960a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04071613ce086004cf67960a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes, it's not useful to set the master address in the client. I suppose it was different a long time ago, hence there are some traces on different documentation. The master references itself in ZooKeeper. So if the master finds itself to be "locahost", ZooKeeper will contain "locahost", and the clients on another computer won't be able to connect. The issue lies on the master host, not the client. On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:06 PM, matan wrote: > also don't really understand why it has to be set in the client, as > according to the flow you describe, the client is getting all it needs to > know from zookeeper (?). > --f46d04071613ce086004cf67960a--