Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EE93D52A for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10058 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2012 20:32:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 9967 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2012 20:32:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 9955 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2012 20:32:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:32:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.169] (HELO mail-ye0-f169.google.com) (209.85.213.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:32:40 +0000 Received: by mail-ye0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q11so162759yen.14 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:32:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L9RPKG9C5ubd4XUpbrkxeWBBHmeKGaVFXyDLUiPj2WA=; b=mK1PJGu804QGxGk2Mx2S3ZlmmhX1OgAXquHuz893DisWHRjLzDL0Pa1cjSJLmEW+tW gu9O5ZYHpTJgE+QbcYdXSe3cFWg+78bvOTdYUZYEGADCtMOCo3KpMunOAlpSrBc2PDMo eOpO4eUhO2aKAMBnLgDCswdLJBt2d65yn1HOK34z7A2BHCUviLAa0IWYCRxCetnZ0Lu2 IRVCfSsByLx+PG5/6Y4BULLQo+CsQU6vAkpbmjYFoIYy8Z9/yMZd3Y2Mr3QkXTxsQddT vV1dzKX+s/27WR/lUjNuohVRf9j/UoXDVvILQH64OH4LHN7p4k5o3Hm1uaddGCFVxmpb gCSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.231 with SMTP id x7mr7566972vdf.121.1350419539885; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.204.6 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:32:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:32:19 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GIHIM9j1oWPEuXsXhmKtTShwDbI Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBase 0.92.1 questions... From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Kevin Lyda wrote: > > Is it a good idea to upgrade to those? Or is the security layer still in flux? You should really use them if you want to deploy security, that's the only reason we offer those jars. J-D