hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: HBase bulk load through co-processors
Date Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:16:38 GMT
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Sever Fundatureanu <
fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also does anybody know what is the flow in the system when a coprocessor
> from one RS make a Put call with a row key which falls on another RS? I.e.
> do the Region servers communicate directly between each other?
>

In this case, the coprocessor in your RS is acting like any other HBase
client. Puts will write from the coproc to the target RS like a normal
write. That is, of course, assuming I understand your implementation.

-n

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sever,
> >
> > I presume you're loading your data via online Puts via the MR job (as
> > opposed to generating HFiles). What are you hoping to gain from a
> > coprocessor implementation vs the 6 MR jobs? Have you pre-split your
> > tables? Can the RegionServer(s) handle all the concurrent mappers?
> >
> > -n
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Sever Fundatureanu <
> > fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree that increasing the timeout is not the best option, I will work
> > > both on better balancing the load and maybe doing it in increments like
> > you
> > > suggested. However for now I want a quick fix to the problem.
> > >
> > > Just to see if I understand this right: a zookeeper node redirects my
> > > client to a region server node and then my client talk directly to this
> > > region server; now the timeout happens on the client while talking to
> the
> > > RS right? It expects some kind of confirmation and it times out.. if
> this
> > > is the case how can I increase this timeout? I only found in the
> > > documentation "zookeeper.session.timeout" which is the timeout between
> > > zookeeper and HBase.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sever
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Sever,
> > > >
> > > > It seems one of the nodes in your cluster is overwhelmed with the
> load
> > > > you are giving him.
> > > >
> > > > So IMO, you have two options here:
> > > > First, you can try to reduce the load. I mean, split the bulk in
> > > > multiple smaller bulks and load them one by one to give the time to
> > > > your cluster to dispatch it correctly.
> > > > Second, you can inscreade the timeone from 60s to 120s. But you might
> > > > face the same issue with 120s so  I really recommand the fist option.
> > > >
> > > > JM
> > > >
> > > > 2012/7/2, Sever Fundatureanu <fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Can someone please help me with this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Sever
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Sever Fundatureanu <
> > > > > fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> My keys are built of 4  8-byte Ids. I am currently doing the
load
> > with
> > > > MR
> > > > >> but I get a timeout when doing the loadIncrementalFiles call:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 12/06/24 21:29:01 ERROR mapreduce.LoadIncrementalHFiles:
> Encountered
> > > > >> unrecoverable error from region server
> > > > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.RetriesExhaustedException: Failed
> > after
> > > > >> attempts=10, exceptions:
> > > > >> Sun Jun 24 21:29:01 CEST 2012,
> > > > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.LoadIncrementalHFiles$3@4699ecf9
> ,
> > > > >> java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Call to das3002.cm.cluster/
> > > > >> 10.141.0.79:60020
> > > > >> failed on socket timeout exception:
> java.net.SocketTimeoutException:
> > > > >> 60000
> > > > >> millis timeout while waiting for channel to be ready for read.
ch
> :
> > > > >> java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[co
> > > > >> nnected local=/10.141.0.254:43240 remote=das3002.cm.cluster/
> > > > >> 10.141.0.79:60020]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>         at
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.getRegionServerWithRetries(HConnectionManager.java:1345)
> > > > >>         at
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.LoadIncrementalHFiles.tryAtomicRegionLoad(LoadIncrementalHFiles.java:487)
> > > > >>         at
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.LoadIncrementalHFiles$1.call(LoadIncrementalHFiles.java:275)
> > > > >>         at
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.LoadIncrementalHFiles$1.call(LoadIncrementalHFiles.java:273)
> > > > >>         at
> > > > >> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
> > > > >>         at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
> > > > >>         at
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
> > > > >>         at
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
> > > > >>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> > > > >> 12/06/24 21:30:52 ERROR mapreduce.LoadIncrementalHFiles:
> Encountered
> > > > >> unrecoverable error from region server
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Is there a way in which I can increase the timeout period?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Andrew Purtell
> > > > >> <apurtell@apache.org>wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Sever Fundatureanu
> > > > >>> <fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>> > I have to bulkload 6 tables which contain the same information
> > but
> > > > >>> > with
> > > > >>> a
> > > > >>> > different order to cover all possible access patterns.
Would it
> > be
> > > a
> > > > >>> good
> > > > >>> > idea to do only one load and use co-processors to populate
the
> > > other
> > > > >>> > tables, instead of doing the traditional MR bulkload
which
> would
> > > > >>> require 6
> > > > >>> > separate jobs?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Without knowing more than you've said, it seems better to
use MR
> to
> > > > >>> build all input.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Best regards,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>    - Andy
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
-
> Piet
> > > > >>> Hein (via Tom White)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Sever Fundatureanu
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
> > > > >> E-mail: fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sever Fundatureanu
> > > > >
> > > > > Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
> > > > > E-mail: fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sever Fundatureanu
> > >
> > > Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
> > > E-mail: fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sever Fundatureanu
>
> Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
> E-mail: fundatureanu.sever@gmail.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message