Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA387D362 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61225 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2012 06:21:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 60970 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2012 06:21:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 60941 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2012 06:21:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:21:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ananthu2050@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.169] (HELO mail-lb0-f169.google.com) (209.85.217.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:21:14 +0000 Received: by lbjn8 with SMTP id n8so5337707lbj.14 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:20:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=tm9U1QDrjwlx7zF7mpYcBhAjH9pOI9CN3169iWSg1io=; b=Ik5E97rKd+jW0d2YM0bDzMjWQTDJP9g2YTG1ZShbAl2576Zi33wISdILGNlL7fz7Ia 9hXLcqFq2s1WLxgt3n7iiKT0ldEKUDXQFMj1qUMuYFfvLbZGcjUZFm9bT0seGPPOr+mg RuRXnIckGuGI/orY8bWX41wIr6pzq8xPRPN204JlHkC7YzAOjD4dsQ9IA/vZsoM7Zf0z tf9ImwvoKxVuMtWfNsEFVftjJBPMvNnHvyeJyBXsupmypde4kOwX7HTe3L3H5jLRbd3B qY8ImEo/MgeujwhbYmCzB04YWfYzguA3Cjk7IWFfzck/+w6JAj0iqm3a+Kgz6tIZp1rV /B1g== Received: by 10.152.144.99 with SMTP id sl3mr383633lab.44.1340950854031; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:20:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.60.109 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:20:33 -0700 (PDT) From: AnandaVelMurugan Chandra Mohan Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:50:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: ways to improve performance of Scan with SingleColumnValueFilter..Please help!!! To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2346ff50da4404c396739a --e89a8f2346ff50da4404c396739a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am using HBase client API to access HBase. My HBase version is 0.92.1 and I have three nodes in my Hadoop cluster. Two nodes are in US and one node in India. HBase master is in one of the node in US. In this HBase set up, I have a table with 1200+ rows. I am developing a web application which uses HBase client java API to retrieve data from this table. This is a GWT web application deployed in JBoss (running in a server farm in India). When I retrieve data from Hbase table based on a column value, it takes 6 mins. In code, I am doing a scan on table with "SingleColumnValueFilter". Given the number of rows, this performance is very bad (6 mins for 1200 records). Is there any way to improve the performance? Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- Regards, Anand --e89a8f2346ff50da4404c396739a--