Return-Path: 
 <user-return-27509-apmail-hbase-user-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45B559185
	for <apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sat, 26 May 2012 23:54:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 43311 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2012 23:54:11 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43248 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2012 23:54:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43240 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2012 23:54:11 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 May 2012 23:54:11 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_TRUNCATED
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fberksoz@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.41] (HELO mail-bk0-f41.google.com) (209.85.214.41)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 May 2012 23:54:05 +0000
Received: by bkcjm19 with SMTP id jm19so2148048bkc.14
        for <user@hbase.apache.org>; Sat, 26 May 2012 16:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=guSxatPc9xN5PuVDizBawv8K4FgnJOoHfkNmi1r1bSw=;
        b=iEgZLBr3G/bSMpebPd4xQsZnel/wwg7Rs3Hw90WIvuupUXdVcqhbpp4goZWb+e3Fhy
         LKU6dODerUjvRIT36Ma7LCnEOpdZme14SW8MfM2jsCwFEWc2CWlgVUNkcjeWbj0Oawcc
         9TtCjeVMHlzqNUxdzSE57jWKhEASupQZmPa9ekDJTjORm+0xZRNNC1hOI2Pir2qFOFZU
         NtwBjNX1QsFfSZGg14bZg6AA5hgZgn6d/pfZYqAnLxAR7FMUggLJTzHMTypShqzibVXd
         V5DUaHV0VbGQCJfGmIyUgqyGL9EkVlYDaYrzAlfdF1bZJdzl2xBEJXgGAwSDsio18E6M
         Bo0A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.157.6 with SMTP id z6mr1584275bkw.15.1338076423482; Sat,
 26 May 2012 16:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.35.151 with HTTP; Sat, 26 May 2012 16:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 02:53:43 +0300
Message-ID: 
 <CALo2NySx_UpXf+wNDeQo8r1HHJrkpv=xF3f=JnmSr5wDf-M7zA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: batch insert performance
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Faruk_Berks=C3=B6z?= <fberksoz@gmail.com>
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cba30e76d1304c0f93107
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0015175cba30e76d1304c0f93107
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi, HBase users,

I have 250.000 Rows in a list.
I want to insert all rows in HTable as soon as possible.
I have 3 different Code and 3 different elapsed time.
Why HTable.batch(List<? extends Row> actions, Object[] results) and
HTable.put(List<Put>
puts) methods 4 times slower than 1.Code which inserts records to htable in
a simple loop ?
Codes and their results :






Faruk

--0015175cba30e76d1304c0f93107--