hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From anil gupta <anilgupt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Coprocessor Aggregation supposed to be ~20x slower than Scans?
Date Mon, 14 May 2012 19:31:23 GMT
HI Stack,

I'll look into Gary Helming post and try to do profiling of coprocessor and
share the results.

Thanks,
Anil Gupta

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:02 PM, anil gupta <anilgupta84@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I loaded around 70 thousand 1-2KB records in HBase. For scans, with my
> > custom filter i am able to get 97 rows in 500 milliseconds and for doing
> > sum, max, min(in built aggregations of HBase) on the same custom filter
> its
> > taking 11000 milliseconds. Does this mean that coprocessors aggregation
> is
> > supposed to be around ~20x slower than scans? Am i missing any trick over
> > here?
> >
>
> That seems like a high tax to pay for running CPs.  Can you dig in on
> where the time is being spent?  (See another recent note on this list
> or on dev where Gary Helmling talks about how he did basic profiling
> of CPs).
> St.Ack
>



-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Anil Gupta

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message