Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9673E9E21 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73848 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2012 09:31:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73718 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2012 09:31:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73691 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2012 09:31:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:31:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of absoftinc@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.169] (HELO mail-gx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.161.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:31:06 +0000 Received: by ggeq1 with SMTP id q1so112282gge.14 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:30:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FK/wLjHmOubWfJW78B6RkOsIlb1N/w8fJqjB0nNh7Go=; b=m1pEV+4T1Mv8qjL5juFvVbqDm4QmurULgJWf+i3PPC1G6AMiJX+lLx6XcgDzvS9U6M NKLiqHBO8X4cRw17lRtS+uBWAKQYKi77DHbN5o14WB3UKnhz3MfKa4r1/iRrQEepZ/sA mGWZQ782Vuf0MlKeoda9++ujirQMEXCGqi54D3dwOUrhDV7YkZZsJDPgd1d/fQCcU/U/ D8enEA1V7z8dqiADPqXMFa4dPj29ZnsUQtB1YXxwbHmUyjlgAVypsgOHFDXV1HkTQusi Xt6tXAM5BE/VcrQ8T4uZXc99jC5V/kQrmXPhls2teEM0Dqb+nkCvd7T4PmISMACwonqJ 9fSw== Received: by 10.236.154.232 with SMTP id h68mr9803605yhk.51.1331199046024; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:30:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (99-32-185-83.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [99.32.185.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o41sm3387103yhj.7.2012.03.08.01.30.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:30:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F587C44.60208@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 04:30:44 -0500 From: Gopal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@hbase.apache.org Subject: Re: Hbase HregionServer on slave References: <4F581568.2020106@gmail.com> <4F58206F.4040902@gmail.com> <4F58266E.3000401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/7/2012 11:56 PM, Stack wrote: > In essence, there is no filesystem for hbase to go against, not until Thank you Michael, I saw your you tube video. You Rock. On a different note, isnt it Best practice to not have a DataNode running along with a namenode on a production set up? If that is the norm rather than an exception then I think i have a working HBase setup. Thanks