Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF1C9982C for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 07:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93073 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2012 07:07:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 90986 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2012 07:07:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 90948 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2012 07:07:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:07:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:07:19 +0000 Received: by obbta7 with SMTP id ta7so10802924obb.14 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:06:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.11.71 with SMTP id o7mr19809450obb.58.1328598418246; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:06:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.71.134 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:06:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:36:38 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Version To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Saumita, You do not necessarily need to change Hadoop version with HBase upgrades (Or at least not for 0.92 yet). 0.92 will work just fine with CDH3 (Which carries 0.20-append). Are you facing any specific issues? The guidelines at http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop would still apply for 0.92. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Saumitra Chowdhury wrote: > Sorry for the last line .... > Is there anyone who are using hbase-92.0 with CDH3 ? Should I continue > with that ? > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Saumitra Chowdhury < > saumitra@smartitengineering.com> wrote: > >> Dear all . >> >> We are going to setup our hbase cluster with hadoop . We were in test >> for few months with hbase-90.2 and hadoop-0.20 (cloudera) . Now we are >> thinking to use hbase-0.92 in our final cluster. But we are confused about >> hadoop >> version. please suggest me hadoop version from your experience . >> >> Is there anyone who are using hadoop-92.0 with CDH3 ? Should I continue >> with that ? >> >> >> BR >> Saumitra Chowdhury >> System Engineer >> http://smartitengineering.com >> 25/5B, Block F, Haji Chinu Miah Road Bylane >> Joint Quarter, Mohammadpur >> Dhaka - 1207, Bangladesh >> >> >> >> >> >> -- Harsh J Customer Ops. Engineer Cloudera | http://tiny.cloudera.com/about