hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Saumitra Chowdhury <saumi...@smartitengineering.com>
Subject Re: Hadoop Version
Date Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:27:54 GMT
Thanks Harsh
I had no problem with hbase-90.2 and hadoop-0.20.
Before move to hbase-92.0 I am just confirming that
it works perfectly.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Saumita,
>
> You do not necessarily need to change Hadoop version with HBase
> upgrades (Or at least not for 0.92 yet).
>
> 0.92 will work just fine with CDH3 (Which carries 0.20-append). Are
> you facing any specific issues?
>
> The guidelines at http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop would still
> apply for 0.92.
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Saumitra Chowdhury
> <saumitra@smartitengineering.com> wrote:
> > Sorry for the last line ....
> > Is there anyone who are using hbase-92.0 with CDH3 ? Should I continue
> > with that ?
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Saumitra Chowdhury <
> > saumitra@smartitengineering.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all .
> >>
> >> We are going to setup our hbase cluster with hadoop . We were in test
> >> for few months with hbase-90.2 and hadoop-0.20 (cloudera) . Now we are
> >> thinking to use hbase-0.92 in our final cluster. But we are confused
> about
> >> hadoop
> >> version. please suggest me hadoop version from your experience .
> >>
> >> Is there anyone who are using hadoop-92.0 with CDH3 ? Should I continue
> >> with that ?
> >>
> >>
> >> BR
> >> Saumitra Chowdhury
> >> System Engineer
> >> http://smartitengineering.com
> >> 25/5B, Block F, Haji Chinu Miah Road Bylane
> >> Joint Quarter, Mohammadpur
> >> Dhaka - 1207, Bangladesh
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
> Customer Ops. Engineer
> Cloudera | http://tiny.cloudera.com/about
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message