Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4647590BD for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95033 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2011 16:43:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 94992 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2011 16:43:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 94984 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2011 16:43:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:43:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.41] (HELO mail-dy0-f41.google.com) (209.85.220.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:43:14 +0000 Received: by dye36 with SMTP id 36so346741dye.14 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:42:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ujuerEKmm+JLCQQFt8V5B9CU8hGxxd10SzcNA0xJ4W4=; b=PCGahZKij5HPsdTW/ZBZmAcw0JDxjgssLT01NjdMFFG5G06aHghRDuGZAWEcqFPNfq VU0NAXl3Vg/IgPhHNscVNO3rdo9Fn9JAoCZ61yguSIYCOeIIH7RG0AJpyddy3UgkYmpK kiRrJN96ysvcBVkno6Imk3Dfkn2f6/5FG9aro= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.17.103 with SMTP id n7mr847161obd.68.1321634573032; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:42:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.12.134 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:42:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:42:52 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kFVzvzhXBJgRXTJP1m9MY7mgN4c Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBASE 0.90.4 and indexing From: Stack To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Ulrich Staudinger wrote: > 1) Why is the transactional package and the indexed* functionality not part > of base hbase any more? Because we didn't think this functionality part of core. We also wanted to remove friction; both core dev friction caused by our having to ripple changes out into a code base few of us knew much about and then friction for the trans/index maintainers as the only way for them to get their changes in was by going via a committer. > 2) What's the best (most developer friendly) way to add additional indexes? Up to this, build it yourself unfortunately. A one-size fits all scalable, secondary indexing soln. is a bit of an undertaking it seems. > 3) Is there an hbase-trx package somewhere, which is compatible with one of > the hbase-0.90x releases? > James' github is the most recent that I know of. Have you tried writing him? Good on you Ulrich, St.Ack