hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: on HBase 1.0
Date Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:57:51 GMT
> From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>

> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:52 PM
> Subject: Re: on HBase 1.0
> 
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>>  It's possible a release of 0.20.20X (X=5 I think) as Hadoop 1.0 is 
> imminent.
>> 
>>  The Hadoop 1.0 release is an acknowledgement of reality -- 0.20 branch is 
> in production at many places.
>> 
>>  I know we agreed to separate HBase versioning from Hadoop versioning, 
> but if we continue to number HBase as 0.X after there is a Hadoop 1.0, there is 
> an implicit marketing message that we feel HBase is not as ready as Hadoop.
>> 
>> 
>>  I propose that we consider, if and when Hadoop 1.0 is released, that we 
> release HBase 1.0 off of the 0.92 branch. A subsequent release off of trunk 
> could be 1.1 or 2.0 at the discretion of the RM and community consensus.
>> 
> 
> Agreed.  Was thinking 0.94 could e be 1.0.0 since its getting a load
> of 0.89-fb branch forward-ports.   Would have to come out right after
> 0.92 though.


Releasing 0.94 as 1.0 like that, for that reason, sounds good to me, but I think that would
imply 0.92 is merely a stepping stone to 1.0 aka 0.94. Perhaps that is accurate.

    - Andy


Mime
View raw message