hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Takuya UESHIN <ues...@happy-camper.st>
Subject Re: HRegionPartitioner has the same problem as HBASE-3111.
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:38:13 GMT

Thank you for your replying.

I made an issue HBASE-4398.

I don't think we should play with the order,
but at least we shouldn't overwrite the configurations specified by user.

I think "HBaseConfiguration.addHbaseResources(conf);" has too strong
effects for mapreduce configurations so we shouldn't use it or just
use new conf created by HBaseConfiguration.create(conf).

And yes, this might be related to HBASE-4297, slightly different though.


2011/9/13 Stack <stack@duboce.net>:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@happy-camper.st> wrote:
>> I think HTable should connect to ZooKeeper at port 21818 configured at
>> client side instead of 12345 in hbase-site.xml
>> and It might be caused by
>> "HBaseConfiguration.addHbaseResources(conf);" in
>> HRegionPartitioner#setConf(Configuration).
>> And this might mean that all of client side configurations, also
>> configured in hbase-site.xml, are overwritten caused by this problem.
> Would you mind making an issue please Takuya?
> Should we play with the order in which settings are done in HTablePartitioner?
> Is the following related?
>   HBASE-4297  TableMapReduceUtil overwrites user supplied options
>               (Jan Lukavsky)
> St.Ack

Tokyo, Japan


View raw message