hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wei Shung Chung <weish...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: HBase 0.90.4 and hadoop
Date Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:20:00 GMT
Thank u it's good to know :)

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Wei,
> 
> Yes, its definitely on the roadmap to release a version with those in
> the near future. You can ask for more information on the hdfs-user
> lists perhaps.
> 
> For now, people run 0.20-append or CDH (which is essentially
> append+security+0.20.2 if you look at its backports, nothing
> proprietary or closed source) in production without issues.
> 
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Wei Shung Chung <weishung@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What is the plan down the road? Would Hadoop incorporate the append/durable sync
feature in the future release ?
>> 
>> Thank you
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Wei,
>>> 
>>> That is correct. You can go either way to get the right HDFS version for HBase.
The docs @ http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop speak the same.
>>> 
>>> On 31-Aug-2011, at 10:01 PM, Wei Shung Chung wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It looks like I have to build a Hadoop version from the append branch or
just use the cloudera CDH3. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>> Thank u
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop  It explicilty calls out
>>>>> 203 as a version you should not run hbase against, not unless you are
>>>>> fine losing data.
>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Wei Shung Chung <weishung@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> Is HBase 0.90.4 compatible with Hadoop 0.20.203 ?
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Harsh J

Mime
View raw message