Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9215F6C09 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64484 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:47:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 64443 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:47:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 64433 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:47:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:47:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lohit.vijayarenu@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:47:27 +0000 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so2271669qyk.14 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PdF1KP44sf4n3cxcw15nbxNKttUv/EtHQxW0Jt/3FTw=; b=BitAKYiZT75oP9SodK6Nfq2WC8EJdULg1tsHuN6mH6MwklRJLWSsjoUDJ4Abtyv9K8 K1MaCgn9FEhWkElThngxG7YVqZmfJP0UX5hnOmeXWN57zkWX+pIeKyg1gY5DLBsTi6yr Za3PcF77pJsQEbUiF4QZFc1CK+we/uMrgkP3s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ArX5TfoBRXxjgRBGZz+t6NGYRC/w/oQBgr2tIsWjEZNyrR2Cgx2pm+nkQhCkWbxs1w 8LthtHaiK/kpmgNh4bLrwcec5YwTClEVI1dNaYoYOTOH5wvRESNr4XaocxJ4bZwdoPMB pxGeId3cQE8iEJMwE1ucJUMVfHr1goJuh2Y2w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.61.7 with SMTP id r7mr3007374qch.20.1308959226677; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.3.17 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Random Reads throughput/performance From: lohit To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517577348bb48e604a67dd1ab --001517577348bb48e604a67dd1ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2011/6/24 Sateesh Lakkarsu > I'll look into HDFS-347, but in terms of driving more reads thru, does > having more discs help? or would RS be the bottleneck? Any thoughts on this > plz? > Increasing number of disks should increase your read throughput. We did and experiment with 5 disks and 10 disks, we did see improved read throughput, but it was not linear. -- Have a Nice Day! Lohit --001517577348bb48e604a67dd1ab--