hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: any multitenancy suggestions for HBase?
Date Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:54:41 GMT
Hi Bill,

At the recent HBase hackathon in Berlin there was some word of ACLs in (the next release of?)
HBase from the Trend Micro guys, I believe.
Check this: http://search-hadoop.com/?q=acl&fc_project=HBase&fc_type=jira


We're hiring HBase / Hadoop / Hive / Mahout engineers with interest in Big Data Mining and

>From: Bill Graham <billgraham@gmail.com>
>To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 6:31 PM
>Subject: any multitenancy suggestions for HBase?
>Hello there,
>We have a number of different groups within our organization who will soon
>be working within the same HBase cluster and we're trying to set up some
>best practices to keep thinks organized. Since there are no HBase ACLs  and
>no concept of multiple databases in the cluster, we're looking to propose a
>simple convention that will hopefully keep people from stepping on each
>others toes (or worse!).
>Does anyone have any best/worst practices they're willing to share w.r.t.
>thing likes table/column naming schemes in a multitenant environment? For
>table names for example, is there anything better than a basic dot-delimited
>naming convention with the group name as the first token?
>Also, I assume there's no performance cost with using long table names like
>there is with long CF:col names. Please let me know if that's not the case.
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message