hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiller, Dean x66079" <dean.hil...@broadridge.com>
Subject RE: What's the best approach to search in HBase?
Date Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:21:31 GMT
What about using Hbasene....is it pretty good....looks just like a distributed Lucene and the
same api and everything?

Later,
Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Kerzner [mailto:markkerzner@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:10 PM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: What's the best approach to search in HBase?

Thank you, everybody. I summarized your advice here,
http://shmsoft.blogspot.com/2011/06/search-in-ediscovery.html, because I
need it for my open source eDiscovery, and now just need to try it all :)

Sincerely,
Mark

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Buttler, David <buttler1@llnl.gov> wrote:

> I store over 500M documents in HBase, and index using Solr with dynamic
> fields.  This gives you tremendous flexibility to do the type of queries you
> are looking for -- and to make them simple and intuitive via a faceted
> interface.
>
> However, there was quite a bit of software that we had to write to get
> things going, and I can neither release all of it open source, or support
> other people using it.  If I had to start again, I would seriously look at
> solutions like elastic search and lily.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Kerzner [mailto:markkerzner@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 5:57 PM
> To: HBase Discussion Group
> Subject: What's the best approach to search in HBase?
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to store, say, 10M-100M documents, with each document having say 100
> fields, like author, creation date, access date, etc., and then I want to
> ask questions like
>
> give me all documents whose author is like abc**, and creation date any
> time
> in 2010 and access date in 2010-2011, and so on, perhaps 10-20 conditions,
> matching a list of some keywords.
>
> What's best, Lucene, Katta, HBase CF with secondary indices, or plain scan
> and compare of every record?
>
> Thanks a bunch!
>
> Mark
>
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the 
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.


Mime
View raw message