Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of oruchovets@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=x/atqmH7b2BgTeqStIVuYTusL14nnU8UXm67KnM1qtv4U64pWX2MCuSHcGXlsXEC3F
         ImHV7072GDcUE1Kj7PqrX5guT0QgY1nk+/X79DVMThKpwnY3H2FfVMRy1icd9Kb3Fqg7
         6ubZZ57CmUwmSwRBtCeAFIz7y+GGWufs1lxVY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinfmAK7txm=DEM5vV3By1SSQrL7+N1782EDoF1m@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikewh3CE5o+0FhGXz-O4-5hMSCHSqrgO1425FAt@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinu1p+bYp7f_-BWWGP_W8=KR1zX5i8zv=87Jmx9@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin3v1PeyhDDJjBWzFo6KB5UqSvjupy_=crYwkQ5@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimzDg-720N1=iXXm6srUwDJ9oWhbrPagbEF-o2O@mail.gmail.com>
	<OF47584091.641BD89D-ON85257840.007AB3D5-85257840.007AEF8E@us.ibm.com>
	<AANLkTinnghYJ3KrG-5QpWQNaRKuBbDRekSaO8P14BaTj@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinVsNRb=91U87wwcChfAtD58xekgYQqceJjiL2D@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimanH0h4SBzWdUvXfTB_ihH4jA9DKEWrT8T_Gxu@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimPEbRKEz7x3JYpbOMUTt5YR7qALsK9eEcy0_Nv@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin6FQu5Z=XQ29_yghdoWBt9Z__5CcoyfYQ_68Xy@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinWOWOAMX2Gp3anguL66v_NJy9dxOxQAdaZBRxJ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinfmAK7txm=DEM5vV3By1SSQrL7+N1782EDoF1m@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:27:03 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimT-F73+ZZRa5An50h80d2njcJtH7PTbFQLe+hh@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: which hadoop and zookeeper version should I use with hbase 0.90.1
From: Oleg Ruchovets <oruchovets@gmail.com>
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0b4dc2bb00a049e9f5e91

--000e0ce0b4dc2bb00a049e9f5e91
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Got it ,
thank you St.Ack.

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> You should be good then.  Make sure you put the hadoop you built under
> hbase/lib (removing the old hadoop).  The hadoop-0.20.X-SNAPSHOT.x.x.
> is just how its named on that branch.  See the build.xml.
> St.Ack
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Oleg Ruchovets <oruchovets@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I get the src from here.
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-append/
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> From where did you get the src?
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Oleg Ruchovets <oruchovets@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Oleg Ruchovets <
> oruchovets@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi ,
> >> >> >   sorry for asking the same question couple of times , but I still
> >> have
> >> >> no
> >> >> > clear understanding which hadoop version I have to install for
> hbase
> >> >> 0.90.1.
> >> >> > Any  information will be really appreciated
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah, our version story is a little messy at the moment.  Would
> >> >> appreciate any input that would help us make it more clear.  More
> >> >> below...
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > 1)  From http://hbase.apache.org/notsoquick.html#hadoop I
> understand
> >> >> that
> >> >> > hadoop-0.20-append is an official version for hbase. I case I am
> going
> >> to
> >> >> > compile it : Do I have checkout main branch or there is a
> recomended
> >> tag?
> >> >> > If someone already compiled this version and had an issues please
> >> share
> >> >> it.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> So, the documentation says " No official releases have been made from
> >> >> this branch up to now so you will have to build your own Hadoop from
> >> >> the tip of this branch.", so yes, you'll have to build it.  The
> >> >> branch-0.20-append link in the documentation is to the branch in SVN
> >> >> that you'd need to checkout and build.  This was not obvious to you
> so
> >> >> I need to reword this paragraph to be more clear.   How about if I
> >> >> insert after the above sentence "Checkout this branch [with a link to
> >> >> the branch in svn] and then compile it by..."  Would that be better?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2) I found cloudera maven repository and I see there only
> >> hadoop-0.20.2
> >> >> > version. Does this version supports durability and suitable for
> hbase
> >> >> > 0.90.1? or I need to copy jars from hadoop-0.20-append to
> >> hadoop-0.20.2
> >> >> > cloudera version? I looked for CDH3 and CDH4 but didn't find
> >> >> > hadoop-0.20-append version.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Again, the documentation must be insufficiently clear here.  We link
> >> >> to the CDH3 page.  We also state it beta.  What would you suggest?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > Question: does cloudera hadoop version (0.20.2) is suitable for
> hbase
> >> >> > 0.90.1?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> CDH3b2,CDH3b3, or CDH3b4 are all suitable (each is an hadoop
> 0.20.2++).
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > In case I am going to use cloudera do I need to install all parts
> >> >> (hadoop,
> >> >> > hbase ,zookeper ...) from cloudera or it is possible to take only
> >> hadoop
> >> >> > installation and other products  (hbase , zookeper) I can install
> from
> >> >> > standard distributions?
> >> >> >
> >> >> Any of above combinations should work.  If you use CDH3b4, you can
> >> >> take all from CDH since it includes 0.90.1.  Otherwise, you could use
> >> >> CDH hadoop and use your hbase build for the rest.
> >> >>
> >> >> St.Ack
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > It took some time , but we succeeded to compile hadoop version. We
> >> decided
> >> > to take an official version for hbase.
> >> >    I am only concern  about version which we get after compilation.
> >> > The version is *0.20.3-SNAPSHOT, r1057313. *
> >> > *   Does this version is a suitable version for hbase?*
> >> > *
> >> > *
> >> > Thanks in advance , Oleg.
> >> > *
> >> > *
> >> > *
> >> > *
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

--000e0ce0b4dc2bb00a049e9f5e91--