Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6506 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:58:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:58:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 37416 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:58:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 37372 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:58:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 37364 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:58:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:58:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-iw0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:58:34 +0000 Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so2918770iwl.14 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:58:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4pnDecenyBneihWIN3Qnq64AYuj/nYfa+O7g70/GCH4=; b=taR/7/AM90opMbqJz3dq4YRDKj0dnNVLKeXf8w33+lh/C670mCPCVpiaAt4ha7P09D VcAc5+1LTC4V9wBorKRScRrPSscI803/u8OXzWRVxW639H8B2lF3poyb+pT4BZspU2/K PPKIDnwbZ0MQviB0ZxyobFqsXC5rl3GR+H9+E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NsN2tqEVj/fm8rxorIPuHsoMEoW7ZgcTtA+PlJc6gLbbyL5bbXCX0tjGvOB3V+yFed pfBPb8/zbELOr9zAnICE+oYyVyCcwo0XiakEi5jgFdePhFqY25s5wI77wig/gn6sQPNG fUe4Ssq0ipyBMe2UkCBNr8ADjPu2ZpS4MKpQQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.165.207 with SMTP id j15mr6666242iby.40.1299801493873; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:58:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.195 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:58:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCE154E8@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> References: <494874.40586.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCE154E8@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:58:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Get Question From: Ryan Rawson To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: Peter Haidinyak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Depends on how well cached you are. Remember, random gets require disk seeks. 239 gets/sec is 239 * 1-3 seeks/sec (1-3 store files per get appx). So that seems reasonable yes, sorry. -ryan On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Peter Haidinyak wro= te: > For the first time I am using a get to retrieve a record vs. a scan to pu= ll back a bunch of records. I discovered that I am only seeing 239 Gets per= second. This is causing my import time to go from 90 seconds to over 27 mi= nutes. Any idea of what would be a 'normal' get rate? > > Thanks > > -Pete >