Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=AmmifdcTS8Lxzvml/OMkS+isBpraz6itA42JBx/k4PLkXe+rru//53wNVGQb3U9equ
         d3EaxP/w8iBX0EAMKmu9UvXPIJSkp6jl0HkOtSh4gbh+97ocskv35DD24Guy1fiqzltw
         +gpStsQlrZUh2pwS9a7UiRNL1Y4RElb+YA3w0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <765045.27156.qm@web130120.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: 
 <2D6136772A13B84E95DF6DA79E85A9F0013649025B44@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov>
	<AANLkTim3EYWXsvSi90mUWB+fHUVztOWJNRhR0cY1=JLM@mail.gmail.com>
	<228649.89470.qm@web130102.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<AANLkTikFLVvo96M6bV=W_X0ZojrfNmhR=K7CcbafskRf@mail.gmail.com>
	<765045.27156.qm@web130120.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:12:26 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikvb6KR=NMfHw6tpNtjABB1OkatwwKUNYP02u1o@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Stack Overflow?
From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
To: Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com>
Cc: user@hbase.apache.org, "Buttler, David" <buttler1@llnl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
<otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Do you have =A0something in mind? =A0Could we be making better use of th=
e
>> sematext =A0summaries?
>
> Hm... we already index HBase and other Digests on search-hadoop.com.
> I was thinking more along the lines of mining the ML archives and doing
> automatic Q&A extraction.
> I don't know how difficult it would be. =A0Maybe the input would be too n=
oisy
> (people don't ask proper questions, answers are not full sentences, quote
> characters prefixing lines from old messages add a layer of complexity...=
), but
> that's what I thought you might have meant.
>

That'd be a nice addition to the docs.  Our FAQ is in need of
updating.  This would be a nice undertaking if someone was up for
taking it on.
St.Ack