Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80828 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 17:21:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 17:21:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 66157 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 17:21:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 64882 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 17:21:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 64732 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 17:21:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:21:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:21:24 +0000 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so2753539wyj.14 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:21:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YYbDqEJK71VCDwAs4phw1om2idMhnnxX1EH7+tdVf40=; b=FH6l5ZjjfwqehODEmfhLQASdm34V69ww6DzR0FQErDXBVkZrUX0gOolE2Mg87F0sLE FsF/cl0baApLDBzlrLJUUU7G50tZTBUBiQAfYNwzDF5bsJz/jvamqK3m8shcZrG491l/ AzEsiYsNkpenE0X2F6s+ICfd28T6m19/YzGmM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OllNt2GrqhZ1kXJTL7BSITMFzK7402AYpnFJKXbd80HiyhZq5m6T6/iyNRwwS2LuqN wlioMTYmcOqb75kKBdhiU47QUIGmU18hPbVpgTIbcJ/K3C7Ygjll1nMo1Odst+jBZpL/ wDQXIyXqVOL9GgigmyXqpET07JkrRVGC8tAR0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.7.137 with SMTP id 9mr584059wep.97.1297963264190; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:21:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.54.16 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:21:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:21:04 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HPw_e2bYaHQ-41OEeNCnalAeSXg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hbase Column Families From: Stack To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Usman Waheed wrote: > I am a newbie to Hbase and am testing on a small 3 node cluster running > Hadoop 0.20.2 and Hbase 0.89. > Please use 0.90 and an hadoop that supports append. See http://hbase.apache.org/notsoquick.html#hadoop > Is there a limit in Hbase on how many versions of a cell one can keep record > of under a given column family? The upper bound is Integer.MAX_VALUE. > I suspect that if i store too many versions of the same cell data over time > it can become a potential performance issue within Hbase. > It could but we'll also be adding optimizations to skip cells with lots of versions. St.Ack