hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <tdunn...@maprtech.com>
Subject Re: HBase and Lucene for realtime search
Date Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:51:23 GMT
I would avoid this, personally.

Serious transactions and complex queries are pretty much incompatible with
simple implementation and large scale.

Flow based updates and write-behind are more the norm.

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I haven't seen any search sites that absolutely need transactional
> > consistency.
> While this is true, databases usually require this?  And so this is
> somewhat of an out-of-the-box view on search, and this's why it's
> perhaps better to frame it more in the context databases, eg,
> transactions, consistency, and complex queries.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message