Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84909 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2011 05:24:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2011 05:24:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 64270 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2011 05:24:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 63962 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2011 05:24:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 63954 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2011 05:24:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:24:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:24:35 +0000 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so2942095wyj.14 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:24:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=F0WVDBRpFA41VGQQHZbb1IiNseFU3vhSbfJFd4EwYIk=; b=ZoIcok0qtHfW7vDmwRJZxlsQ+7uSYWXfeck8CeGeTZU3t/PoeIEL7gUQ1TGqG9uoE5 ZJirMmnK4KBt9DBO2Wl9NZkGh90cmxn5ulBoft/7i/1A2wphI81wBS3/PBb+AnGm6EqI YHADQBWeDqUZ85zLckgjA27JeOFJmrCBA7qxM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=QzhKcqzNk0Q6f0tNO/2WONYBxqODLM44zv4RC8hxKeNFjWMJXzZV9l7LT5V3+jltTS NrkDhJMZc96zhULPQAkOLgx7f08hLw90s1i64qewXyzwkUGIdmoG0IU9VQNVVpUmbI9u BDQLQq094z9AsjA032o2RTRkgWUUniOiIoAtQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.58.144 with SMTP id q16mr2585405wec.74.1296192254495; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:24:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:24:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:24:14 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Hw6HXAk1oxOTDhTbUT11WCgcYQQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Use loadtable.rb with compressed data? From: Stack To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Nanheng Wu wrote: > Hi Stack, thanks for the answers! I am reasonably sure the > partitioning is OK because I just ran the same MR job with compression > turned off and everything works. I'd like to move to 0.90 but for the > short term I am stuck with 0.20. Is there anything I can do, maybe > copy some files from the 0.90 branch and tweak them to run on 0.20? > Please advice. thank you! > Don't try backporting. You'll end up really hating us if you try to do that. I was off in my first answer. We read metadata from the files. Maybe when stuff is compressed we are doing something dumb in loadtable.rb though we're reading metadata, not keyvalues. Do the regions look right? The ones in .META.? Do endkey and startkeys match up as you move from one region to the next? How many regions are there? If same data and it worked previously -- did the previous run have same amount of data? It didn't all fit into one region when you ran it uncompressed? -- then it would seem to point at a issue w/ our loading compressed files. St.Ack