Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54418 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2011 23:53:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2011 23:53:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 35186 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 23:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 35157 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 23:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 35149 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2011 23:53:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:53:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.41] (HELO mail-fx0-f41.google.com) (209.85.161.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:53:23 +0000 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so8333468fxm.14 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=uHhzX0M/dmJhPtEC2X2Z4p1ZTS5MVFRp1XWOmLQimRI=; b=M65fh+p2W2gMF1luMTt0Txi2kTH6JRC5p3hhkosebs6AQytdSFzkr+2MMG0MFztn+2 8kQO8HYdGJNeCxBPkuk65//0SCidi/eavPoHa5+ycqOEfJdEZ3N7y4ULcLWjgDXHnTXT k31gv96zxB5XU0Mth4tx3Giz8KPsL6SycxECQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KKrqe7NsxyaU7BFSwuPYe2qywE4kLc5vMRG53akAm8whX/P1qOyohRcspsOGsOGCEn NpCJtR938rirMnPag/1eICd4KJF1LljhG3oTJjdWEqtl9eSanjlp0NcgNcSRCVagLVrJ mC2oQ3CeWi7/oM20IuVVomt9LICWcJVLxj6I4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.97.7 with SMTP id j7mr1843928fan.18.1294185181919; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:53:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.136 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:53:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:53:01 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UMzexpZyltGnAc2LsunTDQwpFU0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Python + TBinaryProtocolAccelerated From: Stack To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Wayne. It works even though our shipping thrift version is pretty old? St.Ack On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Wayne wrote: > Having worked with the other java/thrift based nosql solution we have been > using Thrift Accelerated Protocol and it works great. It is very fast and we > have seen 3-4x performance improvement on some read operations (wide rows). > We have never seen this "advertised" or referrenced with any hbase python > sample code so I thought I would post this to help. > > from thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol import TBinaryProtocolAccelerated > ... > > protocol = TBinaryProtocolAccelerated(transport) > ... > > Thanks! >