Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65670 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 10:17:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 10:17:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 56675 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 10:17:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 56508 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 10:17:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 56496 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 10:17:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:17:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.66] (HELO nm2-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:17:02 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.188] by nm2.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2010 10:16:41 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.171] by tm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2010 10:16:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1054.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2010 10:16:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 433572.83374.bm@omp1054.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 67663 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Dec 2010 10:16:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1293013001; bh=Zx+cEPP5pY6Vz4UQ+ssqOOU3L4+IFJwYYgV9TnxEMMM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=11KnWBB8MDLDCfoLrOX+YKUYbgSrLgYjM4Md/O1ppyHmOzny5PNLfWzEFfCwPqysfJI1Y78HhXeRK38YoBFX3G+eggDBxESiJGHWr+adhcZsPTFg1o5Pq+iN+MUsTnABi44LpAkH7fvkOC9xQh58J57TPuQ7fN8Wmq4GXp5Ub4A= Message-ID: <277935.62166.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: XR7io5sVM1k8mzGhUy6ONTe.7tYbJIB35htrerjzHth1bcZ zFxG1kWZNVq8lZMyPLimMSmG6tv1uFhBv0TVQMe9TnS_OOZzricCKX1r0aYr 8SV6BE1jPl8.44MaFWRrYpvj06uHzzQGzXrz13220X0IVJkHMZwisMaIWvAb 57jHLlzXmTQMbLapKUyWWu6BbiLasJkbQdub6I.4XJSBhvuyexL.WPH8j3nB o.j3ftQ2SwVTrjcEItHUl0MLn7C9L0WckZbMnIk_fbJDOyGQaqEG5PlxGNKD 1b6Z32JqYuNDLclpjtIzH2sSJw9dJSCPskivnfIre6b7ohwtEI87rV6PXEQM liMI7IyRNg0gqnIS4gq.wTh5o2FH5D94O2.XXp1HWxI3qmHuqxgJRJFN7lG0 Nns_GjRR3cpE- Received: from [69.111.79.82] by web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:16:41 PST X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:16:41 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: provide a 0.20-append tarball? To: user@hbase.apache.org, billgraham@gmail.com Cc: dev@hbase.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill,=0A=0AI believe using CDH3B*2* will get you what you want.=0A=0AASF HB= ase 0.90 will not be compatible with secure versions of Hadoop, which inclu= des CDH3B3. =0A=0ABest regards,=0A=0A - Andy=0A=0AProblems worthy of att= ack prove their worth by hitting back.=0A - Piet Hein (via Tom White)=0A=0A= =0A--- On Tue, 12/21/10, Bill Graham wrote:=0A=0A> F= rom: Bill Graham =0A> Subject: Re: provide a 0.20-app= end tarball?=0A> To: user@hbase.apache.org, apurtell@apache.org=0A> Cc: dev= @hbase.apache.org=0A> Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2010, 11:41 PM=0A> Hi And= rew,=0A> =0A> Just to make sure I'm clear, are you saying that HBase 0.90.0= is=0A> incompatible with CDH3b3 due to the security changes?=0A> =0A> We'r= e just getting going with HBase and have been running 0.90.0rc1 on=0A> an u= n-patched version of Hadoop in dev. We were planning on upgrading=0A> to CD= H3b3 to get the sync patches.=0A> =0A> thanks,=0A> Bill=0A> =0A> On Tue, De= c 21, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell =0A> wrote:=0A> = > The latest CDH3 beta includes security changes that=0A> currently HBase 0= .90 and trunk don't incorporate. Of course=0A> we can help out with clear H= Base issues, but for security=0A> exceptions or similar, what about that? D= o we draw a line?=0A> Where?=0A> >=0A> > I've looked over the CDH3B3 instal= lation documentation=0A> but have not installed it nor do presently use it.= =0A> >=0A> > If we draw a line, then as an ASF community we should=0A> have= a fallback option somewhere in ASF-land for the user to=0A> try. Vanilla H= adoop is not sufficient for HBase. Therefore,=0A> I propose we make a Hadoo= p 0.20-append tarball available.=0A> >=0A> > Best regards,=0A> >=0A> > =A0 = =A0- Andy=0A> >=0A> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hittin= g=0A> back.=0A> > =A0- Piet Hein (via Tom White)=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A= > =0A=0A=0A