Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67281 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2010 02:03:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2010 02:03:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 4506 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2010 02:03:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 4461 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2010 02:03:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 4453 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2010 02:03:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:03:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of peteralantyler@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.169] (HELO mail-yx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.213.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:03:22 +0000 Received: by yxk8 with SMTP id 8so2061491yxk.14 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:03:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc :x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=/lBb7+OQ4Tz0i1RUUo/kgHztQYEd/8cRIzuEwsYO6nI=; b=et0zFnIZ+zeyMyyW1cGk6+/Usl4ATCMaOrSr7gqvDpGZOPz5bxuBSt7Wu+LTzulePW 5lXc8dfgx18E8ssZkX+XC69h6JQi56srSNRKXxzZFq6tgmg6iV13pzuMH1JdtGLbpvtK zoHrJpVR1/7cTOQaJo3DLYORfIbxk1dvlGWZg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; b=u/55NXp4F3sFFDzUm1EKXyceIc4FQf/Yzh1qCaVYx3aQbHgSt3h9q1AUBbs/rNcvSz i7ek31t9wfv7kWNR6csOBVyZApV2X95/69jVxP1idd3RieJnd7Y1+u6SPZeCAtBicFMc hRvyIOVIJSWhua+prjgcnk4gaJPagsemX4I6Q= Received: by 10.151.154.3 with SMTP id g3mr8027705ybo.412.1285552981367; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.28.86.44] ([166.205.14.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t16sm7477127ybm.10.2010.09.26.19.02.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:03:00 -0700 (PDT) References: <29808199.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <09B462D2-00D4-4A54-8E14-CCFC975E7C96@gmail.com> Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) From: Pete Tyler Subject: Re: Can I run HBase 0.20.6 on Hadoop 0.21? Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:03:06 -0600 To: "user@hbase.apache.org" I believe my issue is within Hadoop, not HBase, and as such I was hoping to r= un with the very latest version of Hadoop before putting in serious debuggin= g time. If I am reading the docs correctly it looks like there is currently n= o version if HBase that allows me to use Hadoop 0.21. On Sep 25, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > No You can not. I would recommend against it as well... if you want an > upgrade check out cdh3b2 or hadoop-append branch which has patches for dat= a > durability. The RC of 89 is very usable as well. > On Sep 25, 2010 1:35 PM, "Pete Tyler" wrote: >>=20 >> Apologies if I've missed this information elsewhere but I'm unclear if I > can >> upgrade to Hadoop 0.21 while still running HBase 0.20.6. >> -- >> View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Can-I-run-HBase-0.20.6-on-Hadoop-0.21--tp29808199p29= 808199.html >> Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>=20