Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikQ3UimYE_uuwN_vizf7kig69hMsMsxx-e-bM1h@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C2C8D35.3080707@kalooga.com>
 <AANLkTinwrIiBkWr0X-5me4o7_S9Iji8qfXa1raSE8_1z@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C2CDEFD.7040001@kalooga.com>
 <AANLkTimjGOcADXr3TV_059sTbDqWedW23PzgKKn7lros@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C2DA25E.2000006@kalooga.com>
 <AANLkTikQ3UimYE_uuwN_vizf7kig69hMsMsxx-e-bM1h@mail.gmail.com>
From: Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 11:20:46 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTilQRJJut7-turu4TW3BO1vNs49wJPx7oc2gD4VY@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: About HDFS-630 and hbase 0.20.5
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501423a0506f5048aa80021

--00504501423a0506f5048aa80021
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

Yep, it looks like it's a bug in our releasenote generation script. Sorry
about that - the CHANGES.txt files are the definitive source for what's in
there. We generate the release notes from there, but there's an indirection
in between and it looks like a bug caused us to drop that JIRA from the
notes.

To be clear, HDFS-630 is included in 0.20.1+169.89 (the latest CDH2, ie
CDH2u1) as well as both betas of CDH3.

-Todd

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org>wrote:

> Maybe their release notes are outdated or something, but it is there.
> See http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/2/hadoop-0.20.1+169.89.CHANGES.txt
>
> J-D
>
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Ferdy <ferdy.galema@kalooga.com> wrote:
> > Cool thanks. These cloudera distributions certainly look promising.
> >
> > One final note, I could not find the HDFS-630 patch in the CDH2. I don't
> > mean to nitpick but I'm still left wondering if I should include it or
> not.
> >
> > Do you guys patch the CDH2 with HDFS-630 or what? Or would you say this
> > patch is not so important after all?
> >
> > Ferdy
> >
> > This seems to be the newest CDH2 release:
> > http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/2/hadoop-0.20.1+169.89.releasenotes.html
> >
> > Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, and to deploy the cloudera release on your cluster :)
> >>
> >> J-D
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Ferdy <ferdy.galema@kalooga.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Allright so I will use a cloudera release. If I understand correctly,
> >>> this
> >>> includes simply replacing the Hadoop jar in the hbase/lib folder with
> the
> >>> cloudera hadoop core jar?
> >>>
> >>> Ferdy.
> >>>
> >>> On 07/01/2010 08:23 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Ferdy<ferdy.galema@kalooga.com>
>  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://hbase.apache.org/docs/r0.20.5/api/overview-summary.html#overview_description
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is states that it is recommended to use HDFS-630 patch for
> Hadoop.
> >>>>> So,
> >>>>> why does the hbase 0.20.5 contains a stock hadoop 0.20.2 jar? (Hadoop
> >>>>> 0.20.2
> >>>>> does not have HDFS-630 fixed).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What Ted said, and also we cannot ship with a patched jar simply
> >>>> because it's not a client side-only change. If we did, it would mean
> >>>> that our release of HBase wouldn't be compatible with any official
> >>>> Apache Hadoop release.
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree with Todd, you can simply use CDH2. This is what we do on all
> >>>> our clusters at StumbleUpon.
> >>>>
> >>>> J-D
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
>


-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

--00504501423a0506f5048aa80021--