hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: About HDFS-630 and hbase 0.20.5
Date Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:17:08 GMT
HDFS-630 is in:
http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/3/hadoop-0.20.2+228.releasenotes.html

So you should upgrade to hadoop-0.20.2+228

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Ferdy <ferdy.galema@kalooga.com> wrote:

> Cool thanks. These cloudera distributions certainly look promising.
>
> One final note, I could not find the HDFS-630 patch in the CDH2. I don't
> mean to nitpick but I'm still left wondering if I should include it or not.
>
> Do you guys patch the CDH2 with HDFS-630 or what? Or would you say this
> patch is not so important after all?
>
> Ferdy
>
> This seems to be the newest CDH2 release:
> http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/2/hadoop-0.20.1+169.89.releasenotes.html
>
> Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
>
>> Yes, and to deploy the cloudera release on your cluster :)
>>
>> J-D
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Ferdy <ferdy.galema@kalooga.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Allright so I will use a cloudera release. If I understand correctly,
>>> this
>>> includes simply replacing the Hadoop jar in the hbase/lib folder with the
>>> cloudera hadoop core jar?
>>>
>>> Ferdy.
>>>
>>> On 07/01/2010 08:23 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Ferdy<ferdy.galema@kalooga.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/docs/r0.20.5/api/overview-summary.html#overview_description
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is states that it is recommended to use HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop.
>>>>> So,
>>>>> why does the hbase 0.20.5 contains a stock hadoop 0.20.2 jar? (Hadoop
>>>>> 0.20.2
>>>>> does not have HDFS-630 fixed).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> What Ted said, and also we cannot ship with a patched jar simply
>>>> because it's not a client side-only change. If we did, it would mean
>>>> that our release of HBase wouldn't be compatible with any official
>>>> Apache Hadoop release.
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Todd, you can simply use CDH2. This is what we do on all
>>>> our clusters at StumbleUpon.
>>>>
>>>> J-D
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message