hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: experiences with hbase-2492
Date Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:01:18 GMT
Doh! I meant tcp_tw_reuse. Sorry, paste-o.

  - Andy

--- On Tue, 6/15/10, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: experiences with hbase-2492
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Cc: fvanvollenhoven@xebia.com
> Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 9:59 AM
> tcp_tw_recycle did not do what you
> needed?
> 
>    - Andy
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Friso van
> Vollenhoven wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since I got no replies to my previous message (see
> > below), I went ahead and set the tcp_tw_recycle to
> true.
> > This worked like a charm. The number of sockets in
> TIME_WAIT
> > went down from many thousands to just a couple
> (tens).
> > Apparently, once set to true, the recycling happens
> quite
> > eagerly. Most importantly, the regionservers no longer
> shut
> > down (which was the goal). I am sharing the info here,
> just
> > in case it might help someone sometime.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Friso
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 


      


Mime
View raw message