Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11206 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2009 21:34:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Aug 2009 21:34:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 75380 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2009 21:34:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hbase-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75349 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2009 21:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hbase-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75339 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2009 21:34:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:34:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:34:18 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mdsn8-000333-2y for hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:33:58 -0700 Message-ID: <25052355.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:33:58 -0700 (PDT) From: llpind To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HBase in a real world application In-Reply-To: <78568af10908141402r39eaf95as379147999aaa1214@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: sonny_heer@hotmail.com References: <24920888.post@talk.nabble.com> <00df01ca1aa7$bdc3b220$394b1660$@com> <24927386.post@talk.nabble.com> <78568af10908112045r3fefb83ehb70f564fda02a4b9@mail.gmail.com> <24973523.post@talk.nabble.com> <78568af10908141402r39eaf95as379147999aaa1214@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ryan Rawson wrote: > > Absolutely not. VM = low performance, no good. > If you have a box with a lot of RAM, and you split the box into VMs allocating enough RAM for each. Lets say you have a box with 32GB of RAM, and you put two VMs on it allocating 16GB each... will that be slow too? please explain why you think VM = low performance. thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HBase-in-a-real-world-application-tp24920888p25052355.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.