hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.20 performance numbers
Date Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:50:29 GMT
And when I say 'test suite' i really mean "performance suite"  -- that's the
problem, test suites we've been running test the functionality, not the
speed in a repeatable/scientific manner.

-ryan


On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> The interesting thing is due to the way things are handled internally,
> small values are more challenging than large ones.  The performance is not
> strictly IO bound or limited, and you won't be seeing corresponding
> slowdowns on larger values.
>
> I encourage you to give download the alpha and give it a shot!  Alas some
> of the developers are busy developing and haven't run a test suite this
> week.
>
> Thanks for your interest!
> -ryan
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Ski Gh3 <skigh3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In the NOSQL meetup slides the inserts and reads are really good, but the
>> test is on single column and only 16bytes,
>> I wonder how the numbers would be affected if the row grows to 1K bytes,
>> even 16Kbytes?
>>
>> if the numbers are disk I/O bounded, then we almost have to multiply the
>> numbers by 64 or 1024?
>>
>> has any one done any other test on this?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message