hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Problems when executing many (?) HTable.lockRow()
Date Sat, 09 May 2009 23:36:03 GMT
if we had a compare and set operation would this help you?

Another thing, normally hbase regionserver only runs 10 ipc handler
threads... I'm not sure how relevant or important this is yet. Holding a row
open should not tie up an ipc thread though.

On May 9, 2009 4:19 PM, "Guilherme Germoglio" <germoglio@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey Ryan,

Thank for such a quick response!

The log is here: http://germoglio.googlepages.com/log.zip Unfortunately, I
wasn't running with debug on. I'll do it tomorrow in order to get more data
(Will I be able to find how to turn on debug in the mailing list archives or
in hbase wiki?). Also, you will notice that the log is only from the master
server. The reason for this is that I'm running on the pseudodistributed
mode and the region server log has only one message "2009-05-09 19:04:26,242
WARN org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionServer: Not starting a
distinct region server because hbase.master is set to 'local' mode".

Thank you for the advice. I understand that a simple put doesn't make sense
to lock a row. However, I'm just considering the performance of it. If the
put operation into a single row (which I think is the fastest operation)
isn't fast enough for my project, I'll not even try what I'm really
intending to do, which is atomically getting a value, modifying it (not
necessarily incrementing it), and then putting it back to the table.

I wasn't expecting great performance either, but is it ok to execute a
single put into a locked row in 5~10 minutes?

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com> wrote: >
Hey Guilherme, > > We'd ...
--

Guilherme msn: guigermoglio@hotmail.com homepage:
http://germoglio.googlepages.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message